Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22290187›Full record

ArticleNature methods2012

Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging.

Ulrike Schnell, Freark Dijk, Klaas A Sjollema, Ben N G Giepmans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 274 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
274citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

274 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Ex vivo comparison of ACU193 and lecanemab reveals binding differences in mouse brain.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Principles ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

214 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ulrike SchnellDepartment of Cell Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Freark Dijk
Klaas A Sjollema
Ben N G Giepmans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent fusion proteins have revolutionized examination of proteins in living cells. Still, studies using these proteins are met with criticism because proteins are modified and ectopically expressed, in contrast to immunofluorescence studies. However, introducing immunoreagents inside cells can cause protein extraction or relocalization, not reflecting the in vivo situation. Here we discuss pitfalls of immunofluorescence labeling that often receive little attention and argue that immunostaining experiments in dead, permeabilized cells should be complemented with live-cell imaging when scrutinizing protein localization.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCellsAldehydesCell LineCell Membrane PermeabilityFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansProteinsAldehydesProteins

Identifiers

PMID22290187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.