ArticleInfection and immunity2012
Chlamydia muridarum T cell antigens and adjuvants that induce protective immunity in mice.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological evaluation of vaccines to prevent Chlamydia trachomatis infection using the human in vitro MIMIC system.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026Article
- Interferon-γ Responses to Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccine Candidate Proteins in Women With Different Chlamydia Outcomes.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Immunity to Sexually Transmitted Bacterial Infections of the Female Genital Tract: Toward Effective Vaccines.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Protective anti-chlamydial vaccine regimen-induced CD4+ T cell response mediates early inhibition of pathogenic CD8+ T cell response following genital challenge.Pathogens and disease · 2024Article
- Advances in vaccine development for Chlamydia trachomatis.Pathogens and disease · 2024Review
- Antibody responses toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Preclinical screen for protection efficacy of chlamydial antigens that are immunogenic in humans.Infection and immunity · 2023Article
- Combining Cellular Immunology With RNAseq to Identify Novel Chlamydia T-Cell Subset Signatures.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- A Novel Intranasal Vaccine With PmpGs + MOMP Induces Robust Protections Both in Respiratory Tract and Genital System PostingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- MUC1 Specific Immune Responses Enhanced by Coadministration of Liposomal DDA/MPLA and Lipoglycopeptide.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis: Immune Evasion Mechanisms and Pathogenic Disease Pathways.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Review
- Article
- Identifying HLA DRB1-DQB1 alleles associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection and in silico prediction of potentially-related peptides.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Prophylactic Multi-Subunit Vaccine againstVaccines · 2021Article
- Article
- Th1/Th17 T cell Tissue-Resident Immunity Increases Protection, But Is Not Required in a Vaccine Strategy Against Genital Infection WithFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Cellular Basis for the Enhanced Efficacy of the Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand (FL) Adjuvanted VCG-BasedFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Discordance in the Epithelial Cell-Dendritic Cell Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Immunoproteome: Implications for Chlamydia Vaccine Development.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Parenteral vaccination protects against transcervical infection withNPJ vaccines · 2020Article
- Route of Vaccine Administration Influences the Impact of Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand (Flt3L) on Chlamydial-Specific Protective Immune Responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Major impediments to a Chlamydia vaccine lie in discovering T cell antigens and polarizing adjuvants that stimulate protective immunity. We previously reported the discovery of three T cell antigens (PmpG, PmpF, and RplF) via immunoproteomics that elicited protective immunity in the murine genital tract infection model against Chlamydia infection after adoptive transfer of antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. To expand the T cell antigen repertoire necessary for a Chlamydia vaccine, we evaluated 10 new Chlamydia T cell antigens discovered via immunoproteomics in addition to the 3 antigens reported earlier as a molecular subunit vaccine. We first tested five adjuvants, including three cationic liposome formulations (dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide-monophosphoryl lipid A [DDA-MPL], DDA-trehalose 6,6'-dibehenate [DDA-TDB {CAF01}], and DDA-monomycolyl glycerol [DDA-MMG {CAF04}]), Montanide ISA720-CpG-ODN1826, and alum using the PmpG protein as a model T cell antigen in the mouse genital tract infection model. The results showed that the cationic liposomal adjuvants DDA-MPL and DDA-TDB elicited the best protective immune responses, characterized by multifunctional CD4(+) T cells coexpressing gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and reduced infection by more than 3 logs. Using DDA-MPL as an adjuvant, we found that 7 of 13 Chlamydia T cell antigens (PmpG, PmpE, PmpF, Aasf, RplF, TC0420, and TC0825) conferred protection better than or equal to that of the reference vaccine antigen, major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Pools of membrane/secreted proteins, cytoplasmic proteins, and hypothetical proteins were tested individually or in combination. Immunization with combinations protected as well as the best individual protein in that combination. The T cell antigens and adjuvants discovered in this study are of further interest in the development of a molecularly defined Chlamydia vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.