Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22290151›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2012

Chlamydia muridarum T cell antigens and adjuvants that induce protective immunity in mice.

Hong Yu, Karuna P Karunakaran, Xiaozhou Jiang, Caixia Shen, Peter Andersen, Robert C Brunham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antibody responses toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Vaccines · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Expert review of vaccines · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong YuBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Karuna P Karunakaran
Xiaozhou Jiang
Caixia Shen
Peter Andersen
Robert C Brunham
University of British Columbia · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CAStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Development of a Chlamydia T Cell Vaccine Based on Dendritic Cell ImmunoprotemicsR01AI076483 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI BRUNHAM, ROBERT CONRAD, FOSTER, LEONARD J · 2008 to 2012
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major impediments to a Chlamydia vaccine lie in discovering T cell antigens and polarizing adjuvants that stimulate protective immunity. We previously reported the discovery of three T cell antigens (PmpG, PmpF, and RplF) via immunoproteomics that elicited protective immunity in the murine genital tract infection model against Chlamydia infection after adoptive transfer of antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. To expand the T cell antigen repertoire necessary for a Chlamydia vaccine, we evaluated 10 new Chlamydia T cell antigens discovered via immunoproteomics in addition to the 3 antigens reported earlier as a molecular subunit vaccine. We first tested five adjuvants, including three cationic liposome formulations (dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide-monophosphoryl lipid A [DDA-MPL], DDA-trehalose 6,6'-dibehenate [DDA-TDB {CAF01}], and DDA-monomycolyl glycerol [DDA-MMG {CAF04}]), Montanide ISA720-CpG-ODN1826, and alum using the PmpG protein as a model T cell antigen in the mouse genital tract infection model. The results showed that the cationic liposomal adjuvants DDA-MPL and DDA-TDB elicited the best protective immune responses, characterized by multifunctional CD4(+) T cells coexpressing gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and reduced infection by more than 3 logs. Using DDA-MPL as an adjuvant, we found that 7 of 13 Chlamydia T cell antigens (PmpG, PmpE, PmpF, Aasf, RplF, TC0420, and TC0825) conferred protection better than or equal to that of the reference vaccine antigen, major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Pools of membrane/secreted proteins, cytoplasmic proteins, and hypothetical proteins were tested individually or in combination. Immunization with combinations protected as well as the best individual protein in that combination. The T cell antigens and adjuvants discovered in this study are of further interest in the development of a molecularly defined Chlamydia vaccine.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia muridarumChlamydia trachomatisFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHeLa CellsHumansImmunizationInterferon-gammaLipid AAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesdimethyldioctadecylammoniumInterferon-gammaLipid ALipopeptidesomp1 protein, Chlamydia trachomatisPorinsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22290151
PMCPMC3318408
OpenAlexW2049442931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.