Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22289887›Full record

Trial reportBlood2012

Heparin in pregnant women with previous placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial.

Ida Martinelli, Piero Ruggenenti, Irene Cetin, Giorgio Pardi, Annalisa Perna, Patrizia Vergani, Barbara Acaia, Fabio Facchinetti, Giovanni Battista La Sala, Maddalena Bozzo and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ida MartinelliA. Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ca' Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Pace 9, Milan, Italy. ida.martinelli@policlinico.mi.it.
Piero Ruggenenti
Irene Cetin
Giorgio Pardi
Annalisa Perna
Patrizia Vergani
Barbara Acaia
Fabio Facchinetti
Giovanni Battista La Sala
Maddalena Bozzo
Stefania Rampello
Luca Marozio
Olimpia Diadei
Giulia Gherardi
Sergio Carminati
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
HAPPY Study Group
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess whether antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin effectively prevents recurrence of late pregnancy complications, 135 women with previous history of preeclampsia, hemolytic anemia, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count syndrome, intrauterine fetal death, fetal growth restriction, or placental abruption who had been referred within the 12th gestational week were randomized to medical surveillance alone (n = 68) or combined to open-label nadroparin (3800 IU daily subcutaneous injections) treatment (n = 67) in the setting of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial, run in Italy from April 2007 to April 2010. Primary outcome was a composite end point of late-pregnancy complications. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was stopped for futility at the time of the first planned interim analysis. Among the 128 women eventually available for final analyses, 13 of the 63 (21%) randomized to nadroparin compared with 12 of the 65 (18%) on medical surveillance alone progressed to the primary end point. The absolute event risk difference between treatment arms (2.2; -1.6 to 16.0) was not statistically significant (P = .76). Thus, nadroparin did not prevent late-pregnancy complications in women at risk of recurrence. This finding challenges the role of antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of recurrent late pregnancy complications The trial was registered at http://ricerca-clinica.agenziafarmaco.it as EudraCT 2006-004205-26.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsFemaleHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMiddle AgedPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weight

Identifiers

PMID22289887
PMCPMC3321853
OpenAlexW1965194955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.