ArticleBMC genomics2012
Combining evidence of selection with association analysis increases power to detect regions influencing complex traits in dairy cattle.
Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Meta-Assembly of Selection Signatures in Cattle.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Polygenic Prediction of Equestrian Sport Discipline Among Horses Bred for Jumping and Dressage.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- The Legacy of Infectious Disease Exposure on the Genomic Diversity of Indigenous Southern Mexicans.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Long-term artificial selection of Hanwoo (Korean) cattle left genetic signatures for the breeding traits and has altered the genomic structure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Climate-Resilient Dairy Cattle Production: Applications of Genomic Tools and Statistical Models.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Toward Genome-Based Selection in Asian Seabass: What Can We Learn From Other Food Fishes and Farm Animals?Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Selection in Australian Thoroughbred horses acts on a locus associated with early two-year old speed.PloS one · 2020Article
- Population structure and genomic inbreeding in nine Swiss dairy cattle populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- A genome-wide association study in a large F2-cross of laying hens reveals novel genomic regions associated with feather pecking and aggressive pecking behavior.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Analysis of extended haplotype in Korean cattle (Hanwoo) population.BMB reports · 2016Article
- Use of canonical discriminant analysis to study signatures of selection in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- Article
- Genetic parameters and signatures of selection in two divergent laying hen lines selected for feather pecking behaviour.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2015Article
- Detection of selection signatures in Piemontese and Marchigiana cattle, two breeds with similar production aptitudes but different selection histories.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2015Article
- Recent artificial selection in U.S. Jersey cattle impacts autozygosity levels of specific genomic regions.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Identification of selection signatures in livestock species.Genetics and molecular biology · 2014Review
- Composite selection signals can localize the trait specific genomic regions in multi-breed populations of cattle and sheep.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Linkage disequilibrium and genome-wide association mapping in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.).PloS one · 2014Article
- A genome-wide scan for signatures of differential artificial selection in ten cattle breeds.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Natural selection in a bangladeshi population from the cholera-endemic ganges river delta.Science translational medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHitchhiking mapping and association studies are two popular approaches to map genotypes to phenotypes. In this study we combine both approaches to complement their specific strengths and weaknesses, resulting in a method with higher statistical power and fewer false positive signals. We applied our approach to dairy cattle as they underwent extremely successful selection for milk production traits and since an excellent phenotypic record is available. We performed whole genome association tests with a new mixed model approach to account for stratification, which we validated via Monte Carlo simulations. Selection signatures were inferred with the integrated haplotype score and a locus specific permutation based integrated haplotype score that works with a folded frequency spectrum and provides a formal test of signifance to identify selection signatures.
resultsAbout 1,600 out of 34,851 SNPs showed signatures of selection and the locus specific permutation based integrated haplotype score showed overall good accordance with the whole genome association study. Each approach provides distinct information about the genomic regions that influence complex traits. Combining whole genome association with hitchhiking mapping yielded two significant loci for the trait protein yield. These regions agree well with previous results from other selection signature scans and whole genome association studies in cattle.
conclusionWe show that the combination of whole genome association and selection signature mapping based on the same SNPs increases the power to detect loci influencing complex traits. The locus specific permutation based integrated haplotype score provides a formal test of significance in selection signature mapping. Importantly it does not rely on knowledge of ancestral and derived allele states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.