Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22287335›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2012

Improved MR-based characterization of engineered cartilage using multiexponential T2 relaxation and multivariate analysis.

David A Reiter, Onyi Irrechukwu, Ping-Chang Lin, Somaieh Moghadam, Sarah Von Thaer, Nancy Pleshko, Richard G Spencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Anomalous T2 relaxation in normal and degraded cartilage.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A ReiterClinical Research Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21225, USA. reiterda@mail.nih.gov
Onyi Irrechukwu
Ping-Chang Lin
Somaieh Moghadam
Sarah Von Thaer
Nancy Pleshko
Richard G Spencer

Funding

Improving Sensitivity and Specificity of Parametric MRI Assessment of CartilageZIAAG000922 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SPENCER, RICHARD · 2009 to 2017
$6.3M
Anabolic Interventions in Engineered Cartilage and Degenerative Joint DiseaseZIAAG000923 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SPENCER, RICHARD · 2009 to 2017
$4.0M
Evaluation of Cartilage Tissue Engineering Strategies by IR ImagingR01AR056145 · NIAMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI PLESHKO, NANCY · 2009 to 2020
$3.3M
Magnetic Resonance Analysis of Connective Tissue and MuscleZIAAG000924 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SPENCER, RICHARD · 2009 to 2025
$3.2M
Infrared Fiber Optic Imaging of Degenerative CartilageR01EB000744 · NIBIB · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI PLESHKO, NANCY · 2002 to 2010
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AG000922NIAMS NIH HHS AR056145NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056145NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive monitoring of tissue quality would be of substantial use in the development of cartilage tissue engineering strategies. Conventional MR parameters provide noninvasive measures of biophysical tissue properties and are sensitive to changes in matrix development, but do not clearly distinguish between groups with different levels of matrix development. Furthermore, MR outcomes are nonspecific, with particular changes in matrix components resulting in changes in multiple MR parameters. To address these limitations, we present two new approaches for the evaluation of tissue engineered constructs using MR, and apply them to immature and mature engineered cartilage after 1 and 5 weeks of development, respectively. First, we applied multiexponential T(2) analysis for the quantification of matrix macromolecule-associated water compartments. Second, we applied multivariate support vector machine analysis using multiple MR parameters to improve detection of degree of matrix development. Monoexponential T(2) values decreased with maturation, but without further specificity. Much more specific information was provided by multiexponential analysis. The T(2) distribution in both immature and mature constructs was qualitatively comparable to that of native cartilage. The analysis showed that proteoglycan-bound water increased significantly during maturation, from a fraction of 0.05 ± 0.01 to 0.07 ± 0.01. Classification of samples based on individual MR parameters, T(1), T(2), k(m) or apparent diffusion coefficient, showed that the best classifiers were T(1) and k(m), with classification accuracies of 85% and 84%, respectively. Support vector machine analysis improved the accuracy to 98% using the combination (k(m), apparent diffusion coefficient). These approaches were validated using biochemical and Fourier transform infrared imaging spectroscopic analyses, which showed increased proteoglycan and collagen with maturation. In summary, multiexponential T(2) and multivariate support vector machine analyses provide improved sensitivity to changes in matrix development and specificity to matrix composition in tissue engineered cartilage. These approaches show substantial potential for the evaluation of engineered cartilage tissue and for extension to other tissue engineering constructs.

Indexed as

Multivariate AnalysisCartilageMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProteoglycansSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsProteoglycans

Identifiers

PMID22287335
PMCPMC3366280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.