Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22287248›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2012

Anonymization of longitudinal electronic medical records.

Acar Tamersoy, Grigorios Loukides, Mehmet Ercan Nergiz, Yucel Saygin, Bradley Malin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Impact of Medical Big Data Anonymization on Early Acute Kidney Injury Risk Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Privacy Policy and Technology in Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014
    Article
  9. Reducing patient re-identification risk for laboratory results within research datasets.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Acar TamersoyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. acar.tamersoy@vanderbilt.edu
Grigorios Loukides
Mehmet Ercan Nergiz
Yucel Saygin
Bradley Malin

Funding

eMERGE Coordinating Center - Administrative SupplementU01HG006385 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, PAUL A. · 2011 to 2014
$5.4M
Vanderbilt Genome Electronic Records ProjectU01HG006378 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2011 to 2014
$4.0M
Technologies to Enable Privacy in Biomedical DatabanksR01LM009989 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006378NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG006378NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006385NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG006385NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009989NLM NIH HHS R01LM009989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems have enabled healthcare providers to collect detailed patient information from the primary care domain. At the same time, longitudinal data from EMRs are increasingly combined with biorepositories to generate personalized clinical decision support protocols. Emerging policies encourage investigators to disseminate such data in a deidentified form for reuse and collaboration, but organizations are hesitant to do so because they fear such actions will jeopardize patient privacy. In particular, there are concerns that residual demographic and clinical features could be exploited for reidentification purposes. Various approaches have been developed to anonymize clinical data, but they neglect temporal information and are, thus, insufficient for emerging biomedical research paradigms. This paper proposes a novel approach to share patient-specific longitudinal data that offers robust privacy guarantees, while preserving data utility for many biomedical investigations. Our approach aggregates temporal and diagnostic information using heuristics inspired from sequence alignment and clustering methods. We demonstrate that the proposed approach can generate anonymized data that permit effective biomedical analysis using several patient cohorts derived from the EMR system of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesDatabase Management SystemsHumans

Identifiers

PMID22287248
PMCPMC3779068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.