Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22286994›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2012

Caenorhabditis elegans, a model organism for investigating immunity.

Elizabeth K Marsh, Robin C May

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of aluminum absorption in Caenorhabditis elegans: pre-treatment optimization and the impact of dose and population size.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Novel infection byInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic description ofmSystems · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Brief Review on Caenorhabditis elegans Role in Modelling Neurodegenerative Disease.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth K MarshSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Robin C May
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F000138/1Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has been a powerful experimental organism for almost half a century. Over the past 10 years, researchers have begun to exploit the power of C. elegans to investigate the biology of a number of human pathogens. This work has uncovered mechanisms of host immunity and pathogen virulence that are analogous to those involved during pathogenesis in humans or other animal hosts, as well as novel immunity mechanisms which appear to be unique to the worm. More recently, these investigations have uncovered details of the natural pathogens of C. elegans, including the description of a novel intracellular microsporidian parasite as well as new nodaviruses, the first identification of viral infections of this nematode. In this review, we consider the application of C. elegans to human infectious disease research, as well as consider the nematode response to these natural pathogens.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBacteriaCaenorhabditis elegansCommunicable DiseasesFungiHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansViruses

Identifiers

PMID22286994
PMCPMC3302602
OpenAlexW2129243997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.