Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22285560›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

vHOG, a multispecies vertebrate ontology of homologous organs groups.

Anne Niknejad, Aurélie Comte, Gilles Parmentier, Julien Roux, Frederic B Bastian, Marc Robinson-Rechavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo-Devo.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The ontology of craniofacial development and malformation for translational craniofacial research.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne NiknejadDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aurélie Comte
Gilles Parmentier
Julien Roux
Frederic B Bastian
Marc Robinson-Rechavi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMost anatomical ontologies are species-specific, whereas a framework for comparative studies is needed. We describe the vertebrate Homologous Organs Groups ontology, vHOG, used to compare expression patterns between species.

resultsvHOG is a multispecies anatomical ontology for the vertebrate lineage. It is based on the HOGs used in the Bgee database of gene expression evolution. vHOG version 1.4 includes 1184 terms, follows OBO principles and is based on the Common Anatomy Reference Ontology (CARO). vHOG only describes structures with historical homology relations between model vertebrate species. The mapping to species-specific anatomical ontologies is provided as a separate file, so that no homology hypothesis is stated within the ontology itself. Each mapping has been manually reviewed, and we provide support codes and references when available. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: vHOG is available from the Bgee download site (http://bgee.unil.ch/), as well as from the OBO Foundry and the NCBO Bioportal websites. CONTACT: bgee@isb-sib.ch; frederic.bastian@unil.ch.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualTerminology as TopicAnimalsBiological EvolutionComputational BiologyGene ExpressionVertebratesVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID22285560
PMCPMC3315709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.