Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22285110›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2012

Identifying behavioral circuits in Drosophila melanogaster: moving targets in a flying insect.

Leslie C Griffith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expression Pattern of the AB1-Gal4 Driver inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Temperature integration at the AC thermosensory neurons in Drosophila.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leslie C GriffithDepartment of Biology, National Center for Behavioral Genomics and Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University MS008, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA. griffith@brandeis.edu

Funding

Regulation of Intrinsic Plasticity in Neural CircuitsR01MH067284 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 2003 to 2025
$8.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster has historically been the premier model system for understanding the molecular and genetic bases of complex behaviors. In the last decade technical advances, in the form of new genetic tools and electrophysiological and optical methods, have allowed investigators to begin to dissect the neuronal circuits that generate behavior in the adult. The blossoming of circuit analysis in this organism has also reinforced our appreciation of the inadequacy of wiring diagrams for specifying complex behavior. Neuromodulation and neuronal plasticity act to reconfigure circuits on both short and long time scales. These processes act on the connectome, providing context by integrating external and internal cues that are relevant for behavioral choices. New approaches in the fly are providing insight into these basic principles of circuit function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBrainConnectomeDrosophila melanogasterFlight, AnimalNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeurotransmitter AgentsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID22285110
PMCPMC3340460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.