NK cell genesis: a trick of the trail.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation represses the early immune response against murine cytomegalovirus but enhances NK cell effector function.BMC immunology · 2022
   Article
2. Hematopoietic-Specific Deletion of Foxo1 Promotes NK Cell Specification and Proliferation.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
   Article
3. Crosstalks between mTORC1 and mTORC2 variagate cytokine signaling to control NK maturation and effector function.Nature communications · 2018
   Article
4. FHL2 Regulates Natural Killer Cell Development and Activation duringFrontiers in immunology · 2017
   Article
5. NK cell development in bone marrow and liver: site matters.Genes and immunity · 2014
   Article
6. Mouse natural killer cell development and maturation are differentially regulated by SHIP-1.Blood · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The transcription factors T-bet and Eomes control key checkpoints of natural killer cell maturation.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract