Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Repeated supratherapeutic dosing of strontium ranelate over 15 days does not prolong QT(c) interval in healthy volunteers.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strontium ranelate as a possible disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug: a systematic review.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of the Fluoroquinolones Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin on the QT Subintervals: Sex Differences in Ventricular Repolarization.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Trial
- Influence of systemic strontium ranelate on the progression and as adjunctive therapy for the nonsurgical treatment of experimental periodontitis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021Article
- The Power of Phase I Studies to Detect Clinical Relevant QTc Prolongation: A Resampling Simulation Study.BioMed research international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe study was performed to assess the safety of strontium ranelate in accordance with the ICH, E14 guidelines for QT/QT(c) studies. Its primary objective was to compare supratherapeutic repeated dosing of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹ for 15 days) with placebo on the largest time-matched mean QT(c) variation, from baseline to under treatment values, in healthy subjects.
methodsNinety-six healthy male and female subjects (27.7 ± 7.5 years) were included to receive 1 day of placebo followed by 15 days of supratherapeutic repeated dosing of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹), in a 4 month, randomized, placebo (16 days) and positive-controlled (single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg preceded by 15 days of placebo), double-blind, double dummy, crossover design. Measurement of QT interval was performed automatically on the ECGs with subsequent manual onscreen over-reading by cardiologists using electronic callipers.
resultsThe largest time-matched difference in QT(c) I (individual QT correction for heart rate) between moxifloxacin 400 mg and placebo was observed at 2 h post dose (mean [95% CI] 10.62 [7.90, 13.35] ms). For strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹) the largest time-matched difference in QT(c) I compared with placebo was observed at 1 h post dose (mean [90% CI] 7.54 [5.17, 9.90] ms). No subject had a QT(c) greater than 480 ms during the study. Both moxifloxacin and strontium ranelate were well tolerated in healthy subjects.
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate that the administration of supratherapeutic repeated oral doses of strontium ranelate (4 g day⁻¹ for 15 days) does not lead to a prolongation of the QT/QT(c) interval above the threshold of regulatory concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.