Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22283845›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2012

"Familial" versus "Sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of common microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

Maryam Rafati, Elaheh Seyyedaboutorabi, Mohammad R Ghadirzadeh, Yaser Heshmati, Homeira Adibi, Zarrintaj Keihanidoust, Mohammad R Eshraghian, Gholam Reza Javadi, Jila Dastan, Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A novelJournal of genetics · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Human molecular cytogenetics: From cells to nucleotides.Genetics and molecular biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam Rafati *Department of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elaheh Seyyedaboutorabi *Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad R GhadirzadehTehran Welfare Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Yaser HeshmatiTehran Welfare Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Homeira AdibiTehran Welfare Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Zarrintaj KeihanidoustDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad R EshraghianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Gholam Reza JavadiDepartment of Genetics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Jila DastanGene Clinic, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Mosavi-JarrahiDepartment of Public Health and Social Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Evin, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh HoseiniComprehensive Genetic Center, Hope Generation Foundation, Tehran, Iran.
Marzieh PurhoseiniGene Clinic, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed R GhaffariDepartment of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIran Meteorological Organization · IRIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterstitial Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been investigated. As the balanced chromosomal abnormalities commonly lead to the recurrent ID or multiple congenital anomalies, this study was designed to evaluate whether it was justified to investigate such aberrations in familial ID patients. Three hundred and twenty eight patients from 101 unrelated Iranian families with more than two ID patients in the first-degree relatives, have been investigated. Assessment of a panel of 21 common Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes (CMMS) was carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique.

resultsAmong the families studied, 27.7% had 4-12, 35.6% had 3 and 36.6% had 2 affected individuals in the first-degree relatives. An autosomal dominant inheritance of Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) was detected in a family with no clinical suspicion of WBS. The prevalence of CMMS was therefore,0.99%.

conclusionThis is the first investigation of a panel of CMMS in a large sample set of "familial ID patients". The findings of this study showed the low prevalence of CMMSs in "familial ID" patients in spite of the significant contribution of such aberrations in "sporadic ID" which has a very useful practical impact by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests in "familial ID" patients.

Identifiers

PMID22283845
PMCPMC3284449
OpenAlexW2023629621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.