Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22283786›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on investigational drugs2012

A potential therapeutic role for aldose reductase inhibitors in the treatment of endotoxin-related inflammatory diseases.

Saumya Pandey, Satish K Srivastava, Kota V Ramana

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Non-acidic bifunctional benzothiazole-based thiazolidinones with antimicrobial and aldose reductase inhibitory activity as a promising therapeutic strategy for sepsis.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saumya PandeyUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Galveston, TX 77555 , USA.
Satish K Srivastava
Kota V Ramana
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Role of Aldose Reductase in Diabetic ComplicationsR37DK036118 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SRIVASTAVA, SATISH K · 2003 to 2013
$4.1M
Aldose Reductase: A Regulator of Inflammatory SignalsR01GM071036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI RAMANA, KOTA VENKATA · 2005 to 2011
$1.8M
ALDOSE REDUCTASE AND DIABETIC COMPLICATIONSR01DK036118 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SRIVASTAVA, SATISH K · 1987 to 2002
$626k
Structural Biology /Structural Genomics of TraffickingZ01DK036118 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HURLEY, JAMES H · 1994 to 2006
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK036118NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK036118NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK036118NIGMS NIH HHS GM71036NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAldose reductase (AR) was initially thought to be involved in the secondary diabetic complications because of its glucose-reducing potential. However, evidence from recent studies indicates that AR is an excellent reducer of a number of lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes as well as their glutathione conjugates, which regulate inflammatory signals initiated by oxidants such as cytokines, growth factors and bacterial endotoxins, and revealed the potential use of AR inhibition as an approach to prevent inflammatory complications. AREAS COVERED: An extensive Internet and Medline search was performed to retrieve information on understanding the role of AR inhibition in the pathophysiology of endotoxin-mediated inflammatory disorders. Overall, inhibition of AR appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of endotoxemia, sepsis and other related inflammatory diseases. EXPERT OPINION: Current knowledge provides enough evidence to indicate that AR inhibition is a logical therapeutic strategy for the treatment of endotoxin-related inflammatory diseases. Since AR inhibitors have already gone to Phase III clinical studies for diabetic complications and found to be safe for human use, their use in endotoxin-related inflammatory diseases could be expedited. However, one of the major challenges will be the discovery of AR-regulated clinically relevant biomarkers to identify susceptible individuals at risk of developing inflammatory diseases, thereby warranting future research in this area.

Indexed as

Aldehyde ReductaseAnimalsBiomarkersClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease SusceptibilityDrug DesignEndotoxemiaEndotoxinsEnzyme InhibitorsHumansInflammationSepsisAldehyde ReductaseBiomarkersEndotoxinsEnzyme Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22283786
PMCPMC3315185
OpenAlexW2136739139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.