Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22283597›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2012

Calcium intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies and randomized clinical trials.

Lu Wang, JoAnn E Manson, Howard D Sesso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu WangDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA. luwang@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
JoAnn E Manson
Howard D Sesso
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Vitamin D Status, Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variants, and Hypertension RiskR00HL095649 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WANG, LU · 2012 to 2014
$729k
Vitamin D Status, Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variants, and Hypertension RiskK99HL095649 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WANG, LU · 2010 to 2011
$179k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL095649NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL095649NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL095649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential effects of inadequate or excessive calcium supply on cardiovascular disease (CVD) are receiving growing attention. We review experimental, epidemiologic, and clinical evidence regarding the role of calcium intake in the development of CVD in adults. In vitro and in vivo laboratory studies have shown that calcium may affect the risk of developing CVD through multiple mechanisms including blood cholesterol, insulin secretion and sensitivity, vasodilation, inflammatory profile, thrombosis, obesity, and vascular calcification. A number of prospective epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between dietary calcium intake and CVD incidence or mortality in middle-aged and older adults. The results were inconsistent, and the pooled data do not strongly support a significant effect of greater dietary calcium intake on the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) or stroke. Only a few prospective studies have examined calcium supplement use in association with risk of CVD. The pooled data show no significant benefits of calcium supplement use in reducing the risk of CAD or stroke. No randomized clinical trial has specifically tested the effect of calcium supplementation on CVD as its primary endpoint. Secondary analyses in existing trials to date suggest a neutral effect of calcium (with or without vitamin D) supplements on CVD events, but do not allow for a definitive conclusion. A large percentage of Americans, particularly older adults, fail to meet the US recommendations for optimal calcium intake and are encouraged to increase daily calcium consumption. More prospective cohort studies and large-scale randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the risks or benefits of calcium supplementation on CVD endpoints as the primary pre-specified outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCalciumCalcium, DietaryCardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsHumansNutrition PolicyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsUnited StatesCalciumCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID22283597
PMCPMC3336363
OpenAlexW2160654392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.