Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22282714›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2012

The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Michael Kiefer, Andreas Unterberg

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06722768 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Identifying Gait Changes From a Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap Test Using a Smart Insole in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsNormal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT06857136 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsHydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebrospinal-fluid Orexin-A levels in different neurocognitive disorders: a comparison study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cognitive decline after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for normal pressure hydrocephalus.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael KieferKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Andreas Unterberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNormal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) arises in adulthood and is characterized by a typical combination of clinical and radiological findings. The mean basal intracranial pressure is normal or mildly elevated. The typical signs of the disease are gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and dementia. The difficulty of distinguishing NPH from other neurodegenerative disorders is the likely reason why some 80% of cases remain unrecognized and untreated. According to current evidence, the spontaneous course of NPH ends, for the vast majority of patients, in dependence on nursing care.

methodsThis review article is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search in Medline and on national and international guidelines for the management of NPH.

resultsStudies with a high evidence level are lacking; thus, the current state of knowledge about NPH is derived from studies of low or intermediate evidence levels, e.g., observational studies. Modern forms of treatment lead to clinical improvement in 70% to 90% of treated patients. The treatment of choice is the implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The differential diagnosis is complicated by the fact that three-quarters of patients with NPH severe enough to require treatment also suffer from another neurodegenerative disorder. Therefore, the clinical findings and imaging studies often do not suffice to establish the indication for surgery. To do this, a further, semi-invasive diagnostic procedure is recommended. Current risk/benefit analyses indicate that shunt operations improve outcome compared to the spontaneous course of the disease.

conclusionNormal pressure hydrocephalus should always enter into the differential diagnosis of patients who present with its characteristic manifestations. If the diagnosis of NPH is confirmed, it should be treated at an early stage.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID22282714
PMCPMC3265984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.