Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22282579›Full record

ReviewGhana medical journal2011

Ethics and electronic health information technology: challenges for evidence-based medicine and the physician-patient relationship.

I D Norman, M K Aikins, F N Binka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ghana medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I D NormanDepartment of Biological, Environmental & Occupational Health Science, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 13, Legon, Accra, Ghana. ishmael_norman@yahoo.com
M K Aikins
F N Binka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), and the National Identification Authority (NIA), pose ethical challenges to the physician-patient relationship due to interoperability. This paper explores (1) the national legislation on Electronic Health Information Technology (EHIT), (2) the ethics of information technology and public health and (3) the effect on the Physician-patient relationship.

methodThis study consisted of systematic literature and internet review of the legislation, information technology, the national health insurance program, and the physician-patient relationship.

resultThe result shows that (1) EHIT have eroded a big part of the confidentiality between the physician and patient; (2) The encroachment on privacy is an inevitable outcome of EHIT; (3) Legislation on privacy, the collection, storage and uses of electronic health information is needed and; (4) the nexus between EHIT, NHIS, NHA, Ethics, the physician-patient relationship and privacy.

conclusionThe study highlights the lack of protection for physician-patient relationship as medical practice transitions from the conventional to the modern, information technology driven domain.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsEvidence-Based MedicineFocus GroupsGhanaHumansInterviews as TopicMedical InformaticsNational Health ProgramsPhysician-Patient RelationsElectronic Health InformationLegislationNational Health Insurance SchemeNational Identification AuthorityPhysician-patient RelationshipPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID22282579
PMCPMC3266146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.