Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22282478›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2012

Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.

Darshika Chhabra, Anton I Skaro, Joseph R Leventhal, Pranav Dalal, Gaurav Shah, Edward Wang, Lorenzo Gallon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metabolic consequences of modern immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Darshika ChhabraKidney Transplant, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA.
Anton I Skaro
Joseph R Leventhal
Pranav Dalal
Gaurav Shah
Edward Wang
Lorenzo Gallon
Northwestern University · USAdvocate Christ Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe optimal maintenance immunosuppressive regimen to improve long-term renal allograft function and graft survival is yet to be determined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This observational study prospectively compared tacrolimus/sirolimus with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients using a prednisone-free regimen with over 8.5 years of follow-up. Patients received methylprednisonlone and anti-IL2 receptor antagonist (Basiliximab) induction and were blindly randomized to either the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (n=45) or tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=37) groups. Outcome measures included patient and renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and estimated GFR.

resultsThe tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group compared with the tacrolimus/sirolimus group had overall better renal allograft survival (91% versus 70%, P=0.02); 13 patients (35.1%) in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group and 8 patients (17.8%) in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (P=0.07). By 3 months post-transplant, estimated GFR was significantly lower in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group (47.7 versus 59.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), P=0.0002), and this trend persisted throughout the follow-up period. Also, the slope of decline in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group was significantly steeper than in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group.

conclusionsThis study shows that, in a prednisone-free immunosuppressive regimen, long-term renal graft survival and function are significantly worse in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group than the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group. The synergistic nephrotoxic effect and higher acute rejection rates in the tacrolimus/sirolimus compared with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil group adversely affect graft survival.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAcute DiseaseAdultBiopsyChicagoChi-Square DistributionDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidPrednisoneSirolimusTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID22282478
PMCPMC3302671
OpenAlexW2133628575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.