Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22282453›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2013

A randomized controlled trial of family intervention for co-occurring substance use and severe psychiatric disorders.

Kim T Mueser, Shirley M Glynn, Corrine Cather, Haiyi Xie, Roberto Zarate, Lindy Fox Smith, Robin E Clark, Jennifer D Gottlieb, Rosemarie Wolfe, James Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Psychoeducation for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Trans-Sector Integrated Treatment in Psychosis and Addiction.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bipolar disorder.Lancet (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of clinical co-morbidities.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kim T MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Department of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Avenue, West, Boston, MA 02215, USA. mueser@bu.edu
Shirley M Glynn
Corrine Cather
Haiyi Xie
Roberto Zarate
Lindy Fox Smith
Robin E Clark
Jennifer D Gottlieb
Rosemarie Wolfe
James Feldman
Boston University · USDartmouth College · USDartmouth Psychiatric Research Center · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Mental Health Center · USPacific Clinics · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

FAMILY INTERVENTION FOR SMI AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERSR01MH062629 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MUESER, KIM T · 2001 to 2005
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH62629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders have a profound impact on the course of severe mental illnesses and on the family, but little research has evaluated the impact of family intervention for this population. To address this question, a randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing a brief (2-3 mo) Family Education (ED) program with a longer-term (9-18 mo) program that combined education with teaching communication and problem-solving skills, Family Intervention for Dual Disorders (FIDD). A total of 108 clients (77% schizophrenia-spectrum) and a key relative were randomized to either ED or FIDD and assessed at baseline and every 6 months for 3 years. Rates of retention of families in both programs were moderate. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that clients in both programs improved in psychiatric, substance abuse, and functional outcomes, as did key relatives in knowledge of co-occurring disorders, burden, and mental health functioning. Clients in FIDD had significantly less severe overall psychiatric symptoms and psychotic symptoms and tended to improve more in functioning. Relatives in FIDD improved more in mental health functioning and knowledge of co-occurring disorders. There were no consistent differences between the programs in substance abuse severity or family burden. The findings support the utility of family intervention for co-occurring disorders, and the added benefits of communication and problem-solving training, but also suggest the need to modify these programs to retain more families in treatment in order to provide them with the information and skills they need to overcome the effects of these disorders.

Indexed as

FamilySchizophrenic PsychologyAdultAgedBipolar DisorderDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)Family TherapyFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID22282453
PMCPMC3627753
OpenAlexW2139096716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.