Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22282131›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2012

Feasibility of implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in a community hospital.

E A Bradshaw, S Cuzzi, S C Kiernan, N Nagel, J A Becker, G R Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pulse Oximetry During the First 24 Hours as a Screening Tool for Congenital Heart Defects.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E A BradshawChildren's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA. ebradsha@childrensnational.org
S Cuzzi
S C Kiernan
N Nagel
J A Becker
G R Martin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePulse oximetry has been recognized as a promising screening tool for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). The aim of this research was to study the feasibility of implementation in a community hospital setting. STUDY

designMeetings were conducted to determine an implementation plan. Pulse oximetry was performed on the right hand and foot after 24 h of age. Newborns with a saturation ≤ 95% or a ≥ 3% difference were considered to have a positive screen. Screening barriers, screening time and ability to effectively screen all eligible newborns were noted.

resultFrom January 2009 through May 2010, of 6841 eligible newborns, 6745 newborns (98.6%) were screened. Of the nine infants with positive pulse oximetry screens, one had CCHD, four had CHD and four others were determined to have false positive screens. Average screening time was 3.5 min (0 to 35 min).

conclusionPulse oximetry can be implemented successfully in community hospitals without an excessive number of false positives or additional nursing staff.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningOximetryFeasibility StudiesHeart Defects, CongenitalHospitals, CommunityHumansInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID22282131
PMCPMC3432220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.