Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22281826›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Assessment of differential pharmacodynamic effects using optical coherence tomography in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Pearse A Keane, Florian M Heussen, Yanling Ouyang, Nils Mokwa, Alexander C Walsh, Adnan Tufail, Srinivas R Sadda, Praveen J Patel

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pearse A KeaneNIHR-National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS-National Health Service Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Florian M Heussen
Yanling Ouyang
Nils Mokwa
Alexander C Walsh
Adnan Tufail
Srinivas R Sadda
Praveen J Patel
Moorfields Eye Hospital · GBDoheny Eye Institute · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Optics Instrumentation for Advanced Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY014375 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID R · 2003 to 2012
$14.9M
VISION RESEARCHP30EY003040 · NEI · DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE · PI SUN, DEMING · 1985 to 2013
$7.0M
Department of Health 1286NEI NIH HHS EY03040NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003040NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo use novel OCT parameters in assessing the differential pharmacodynamic effects of bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), pegaptanib (Macugen; OSI Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY), and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) in a recently completed phase III/IV clinical trial.

methodsData from 122 patients participating in the Avastin (Bevacizumab) for Choroidal Neovascularization (ABC) trial, were evaluated. OCT scans were analyzed with custom software. Changes in the volume of the neurosensory retina, amount of subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelium detachment (PED), and subretinal tissue (SRT), were calculated over the 54-week trial period.

resultsReductions in retinal edema were more than twice as great from bevacizumab as from pegaptanib (-0.82 mm³ vs. -0.31 mm³), whereas SRF reduction was more than three times greater (-0.54 mm³ vs. -0.15 mm³. Both bevacizumab and pegaptanib led to rapid reductions in SRT; however, in those receiving pegaptanib, these improvements were not maintained (at week 54, -0.22 mm³ vs. +0.18 mm³). Acute increases in SRF were seen 1 week after PDT (+0.36 mm³) and, across all treatment groups, PED volume tended to remain unchanged or to regress only slowly.

conclusionsIn clinical trials, quantitative OCT subanalysis increases the amount of clinically useful information that can be obtained from OCT images. In the emerging era of neovascular AMD therapeutics, the capacity of OCT to provide such detailed pharmacodynamic information in a noninvasive manner is likely to attain increased importance. In future comparative studies, evaluation of SRT may highlight differential effects on vascular proliferation, whereas measurement of PED volume may be useful for the estimation of retinal and subretinal pigment epithelium (RPE) therapeutic penetration. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, ISRCTN83325075.).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAptamers, NucleotideBevacizumabChoroidal NeovascularizationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAptamers, NucleotideBevacizumabpegaptanibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID22281826
PMCPMC3339900
OpenAlexW2031550331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.