Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22281052›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2012

Orientational preferences of neighboring helices can drive ER insertion of a marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helix.

Karin Ojemalm, Katrin K Halling, Ingmarie Nilsson, Gunnar von Heijne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Biogenesis of Multipass Membrane Proteins.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Untangling the complexity of membrane protein folding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Efficient integration of transmembrane domains depends on the folding properties of the upstream sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karin OjemalmDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Center for Biomembrane Research, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Katrin K Halling
Ingmarie Nilsson
Gunnar von Heijne

Funding

European Research Council 232648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

α-helical integral membrane proteins critically depend on the correct insertion of their transmembrane α helices into the lipid bilayer for proper folding, yet a surprisingly large fraction of the transmembrane α helices in multispanning integral membrane proteins are not sufficiently hydrophobic to insert into the target membrane by themselves. How can such marginally hydrophobic segments nevertheless form transmembrane helices in the folded structure? Here, we show that a transmembrane helix with a strong orientational preference (N(cyt)-C(lum) or N(lum)-C(cyt)) can both increase and decrease the hydrophobicity threshold for membrane insertion of a neighboring, marginally hydrophobic helix. This effect helps explain the "missing hydrophobicity" in polytopic membrane proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedDogsEndoplasmic ReticulumEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsKineticsMembrane ProteinsMicrosomesOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-DependentProtein Structure, SecondarySerine EndopeptidasesSymportersEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-DependentSerine Endopeptidasessodium-bile acid cotransporterSymporterstype I signal peptidase

Identifiers

PMID22281052
PMCPMC3553544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.