Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22280501›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2012

A cluster randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 'whole systems' model of self-management support for the management of long- term conditions in primary care: trial protocol.

Peter Bower, Anne Kennedy, David Reeves, Anne Rogers, Tom Blakeman, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Robert Bowen, Martin Eden, Caroline Gardner, Mark Hann and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A future in primary care research: a view from the middle.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolving 'self'-management: exploring the role of social network typologies on individual long-term condition management.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter BowerPrimary Care Research Group, Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester, 5th Floor Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Anne Kennedy
David Reeves
Anne Rogers
Tom Blakeman
Carolyn Chew-Graham
Robert Bowen
Martin Eden
Caroline Gardner
Mark Hann
Victoria Lee
Rebecca Morris
Joanne Protheroe
Gerry Richardson
Caroline Sanders
Angela Swallow
David Thompson
University of Manchester · GBKeele University · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with long-term conditions are increasingly the focus of quality improvement activities in health services to reduce the impact of these conditions on quality of life and to reduce the burden on care utilisation. There is significant interest in the potential for self-management support to improve health and reduce utilisation in these patient populations, but little consensus concerning the optimal model that would best provide such support. We describe the implementation and evaluation of self-management support through an evidence-based 'whole systems' model involving patient support, training for primary care teams, and service re-organisation, all integrated into routine delivery within primary care.

methodsThe evaluation involves a large-scale, multi-site study of the implementation, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of this model of self-management support using a cluster randomised controlled trial in patients with three long-term conditions of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The outcome measures include healthcare utilisation and quality of life. We describe the methods of the cluster randomised trial. DISCUSSION: If the 'whole systems' model proves effective and cost-effective, it will provide decision-makers with a model for the delivery of self-management support for populations with long-term conditions that can be implemented widely to maximise 'reach' across the wider patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN: ISRCTN90940049.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisDiabetes MellitusHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID22280501
PMCPMC3274470
OpenAlexW2114971217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.