ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Automatic categorization of diverse experimental information in the bioscience literature.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Characterization and automated classification of sentences in the biomedical literature: a case study for biocuration of gene expression and protein kinase activity.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Article
- FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features.Genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Utilizing image and caption information for biomedical document classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- FlyBase: updates to the Drosophila melanogaster knowledge base.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- A behind-the-scenes tour of the IEDB curation process: an optimized process empirically integrating automation and human curation efforts.Immunology · 2020Article
- WormBase: a modern Model Organism Information Resource.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Text mining meets community curation: a newly designed curation platform to improve author experience and participation at WormBase.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- Figure and caption extraction from biomedical documents.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- An effective biomedical document classification scheme in support of biocuration: addressing class imbalance.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- 2018 Update on Protein-Protein Interaction Data in WormBase.microPublication biology · 2018Article
- A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Textpresso Central: a customizable platform for searching, text mining, viewing, and curating biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Can we replace curation with information extraction software?Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Review
- Web services-based text-mining demonstrates broad impacts for interoperability and process simplification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Article
- PMRD: a curated database for genes and mutants involved in plant male reproduction.BMC plant biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCuration of information from bioscience literature into biological knowledge databases is a crucial way of capturing experimental information in a computable form. During the biocuration process, a critical first step is to identify from all published literature the papers that contain results for a specific data type the curator is interested in annotating. This step normally requires curators to manually examine many papers to ascertain which few contain information of interest and thus, is usually time consuming. We developed an automatic method for identifying papers containing these curation data types among a large pool of published scientific papers based on the machine learning method Support Vector Machine (SVM). This classification system is completely automatic and can be readily applied to diverse experimental data types. It has been in use in production for automatic categorization of 10 different experimental datatypes in the biocuration process at WormBase for the past two years and it is in the process of being adopted in the biocuration process at FlyBase and the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD). We anticipate that this method can be readily adopted by various databases in the biocuration community and thereby greatly reducing time spent on an otherwise laborious and demanding task. We also developed a simple, readily automated procedure to utilize training papers of similar data types from different bodies of literature such as C. elegans and D. melanogaster to identify papers with any of these data types for a single database. This approach has great significance because for some data types, especially those of low occurrence, a single corpus often does not have enough training papers to achieve satisfactory performance.
resultsWe successfully tested the method on ten data types from WormBase, fifteen data types from FlyBase and three data types from Mouse Genomics Informatics (MGI). It is being used in the curation work flow at WormBase for automatic association of newly published papers with ten data types including RNAi, antibody, phenotype, gene regulation, mutant allele sequence, gene expression, gene product interaction, overexpression phenotype, gene interaction, and gene structure correction.
conclusionsOur methods are applicable to a variety of data types with training set containing several hundreds to a few thousand documents. It is completely automatic and, thus can be readily incorporated to different workflow at different literature-based databases. We believe that the work presented here can contribute greatly to the tremendous task of automating the important yet labor-intensive biocuration effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.