ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2011
Effective Connectivity Modeling for fMRI: Six Issues and Possible Solutions Using Linear Dynamic Systems.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Effective connectivity underlying neural and behavioral components of prism adaptation.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Enhanced inter-regional coupling of neural responses and repetition suppression provide separate contributions to long-term behavioral priming.Communications biology · 2021Article
- The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Review
- Reduced fronto-amygdalar connectivity in adolescence is associated with increased depression symptoms over time.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2017Article
- Determining Excitatory and Inhibitory Neuronal Activity from Multimodal fMRI Data Using a Generative Hemodynamic Model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- State space modeling of time-varying contemporaneous and lagged relations in connectivity maps.NeuroImage · 2016Article
- Developmental sex differences in resting state functional connectivity of amygdala sub-regions.NeuroImage · 2015Article
- Evoked effective connectivity of the human neocortex.Human brain mapping · 2014Article
- Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals temporal evolution of coupling between supramodal cortical attention networks and the brainstem.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Separating lexical-semantic access from other mnemonic processes in picture-name verification.Frontiers in psychology · 2013Article
- FATCAT: (an efficient) Functional and Tractographic Connectivity Analysis Toolbox.Brain connectivity · 2013Article
- Identifying effective connectivity parameters in simulated fMRI: a direct comparison of switching linear dynamic system, stochastic dynamic causal, and multivariate autoregressive models.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
- Hippocampal-prefrontal engagement and dynamic causal interactions in the maturation of children's fact retrieval.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2012Article
- New concepts in brain networks.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2012Article
- MR connectomics: a conceptual framework for studying the developing brain.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of directionally specific or causal interactions between regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data has proliferated. Here we identify six issues with existing effective connectivity methods that need to be addressed. The issues are discussed within the framework of linear dynamic systems for fMRI (LDSf). The first concerns the use of deterministic models to identify inter-regional effective connectivity. We show that deterministic dynamics are incapable of identifying the trial-to-trial variability typically investigated as the marker of connectivity while stochastic models can capture this variability. The second concerns the simplistic (constant) connectivity modeled by most methods. Connectivity parameters of the LDSf model can vary at the same timescale as the input data. Further, extending LDSf to mixtures of multiple models provides more robust connectivity variation. The third concerns the correct identification of the network itself including the number and anatomical origin of the network nodes. Augmentation of the LDSf state space can identify additional nodes of a network. The fourth concerns the locus of the signal used as a "node" in a network. A novel extension LDSf incorporating sparse canonical correlations can select most relevant voxels from an anatomically defined region based on connectivity. The fifth concerns connection interpretation. Individual parameter differences have received most attention. We present alternative network descriptors of connectivity changes which consider the whole network. The sixth concerns the temporal resolution of fMRI data relative to the timescale of the inter-regional interactions in the brain. LDSf includes an "instantaneous" connection term to capture connectivity occurring at timescales faster than the data resolution. The LDS framework can also be extended to statistically combine fMRI and EEG data. The LDSf framework is a promising foundation for effective connectivity analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.