Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22279430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2011

Effective Connectivity Modeling for fMRI: Six Issues and Possible Solutions Using Linear Dynamic Systems.

Jason F Smith, Ajay Pillai, Kewei Chen, Barry Horwitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals temporal evolution of coupling between supramodal cortical attention networks and the brainstem.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New concepts in brain networks.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason F SmithBrain Imaging and Modeling Section, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ajay Pillai
Kewei Chen
Barry Horwitz

Funding

Brain Imaging And ModelingZIADC000057 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI HORWITZ, BARRY · 2009 to 2018
$8.8M
Neuroanatomical Substrates of Aging & Cognitive DeclineR01AG025526 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALEXANDER, GENE E · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of directionally specific or causal interactions between regions in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data has proliferated. Here we identify six issues with existing effective connectivity methods that need to be addressed. The issues are discussed within the framework of linear dynamic systems for fMRI (LDSf). The first concerns the use of deterministic models to identify inter-regional effective connectivity. We show that deterministic dynamics are incapable of identifying the trial-to-trial variability typically investigated as the marker of connectivity while stochastic models can capture this variability. The second concerns the simplistic (constant) connectivity modeled by most methods. Connectivity parameters of the LDSf model can vary at the same timescale as the input data. Further, extending LDSf to mixtures of multiple models provides more robust connectivity variation. The third concerns the correct identification of the network itself including the number and anatomical origin of the network nodes. Augmentation of the LDSf state space can identify additional nodes of a network. The fourth concerns the locus of the signal used as a "node" in a network. A novel extension LDSf incorporating sparse canonical correlations can select most relevant voxels from an anatomically defined region based on connectivity. The fifth concerns connection interpretation. Individual parameter differences have received most attention. We present alternative network descriptors of connectivity changes which consider the whole network. The sixth concerns the temporal resolution of fMRI data relative to the timescale of the inter-regional interactions in the brain. LDSf includes an "instantaneous" connection term to capture connectivity occurring at timescales faster than the data resolution. The LDS framework can also be extended to statistically combine fMRI and EEG data. The LDSf framework is a promising foundation for effective connectivity analysis.

Indexed as

dynamic systemseffective connectivityfMRI

Identifiers

PMID22279430
PMCPMC3260563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.