Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22278325›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Protective immunity against tularemia provided by an adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing Tul4 of Francisella tularensis.

Ravinder Kaur, Shan Chen, Maria T Arévalo, Qingfu Xu, Yanping Chen, Mingtao Zeng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Comparative evaluation of protective immunity againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tularemia vaccines.Folia microbiologica · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. T-cell-mediated cross-strain protective immunity elicited by prime-boost vaccination with a live attenuated influenza vaccine.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ravinder KaurDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Shan Chen
Maria T Arévalo
Qingfu Xu
Yanping Chen
Mingtao Zeng
Texas Tech University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Development of a New Tularemia VaccineR21AI059225 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ZENG, MINGTAO · 2005 to 2006
$617k
NIAID NIH HHS AI059225NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI059225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Francisella tularensis, a category A bioterrorism agent, is a highly infectious organism that is passed on via skin contact and inhalation routes. A live attenuated vaccine strain (LVS) has been developed, but it has not been licensed for public use by the FDA due to safety concerns. Thus, there exists a need for a safer and improved vaccine. In this study, we have constructed a replication-incompetent adenovirus, Ad/opt-Tul4, carrying a codon-optimized gene for expression of a membrane protein, Tul4, of F. tularensis LVS. Its ability to protect against lethal challenge and its immunogenicity were evaluated in a murine model. An intramuscular injection of a single dose (1 × 10(7) PFU) of Ad/opt-Tul4 elicited a robust Tul4-specific antibody response. Assays suggest a Th1-driven response. A single dose elicited 20% protection against challenge with 100 × 50% lethal dose (LD(50)) F. tularensis LVS; two additional booster shots resulted in 60% protection. In comparison, three doses of 5 μg recombinant Tul4 protein did not elicit significant protection against challenge. Therefore, the Ad/opt-Tul4 vaccine was more effective than the protein vaccine, and protection was dose dependent. Compared to LVS, the protection rate is lower, but an adenovirus-vectored vaccine may be more attractive due to its enhanced safety profile and mucosal route of delivery. Furthermore, simple genetic modification of the vaccine may potentially produce antibodies protective against a fully virulent strain of F. tularensis. Our data support the development and further research of an adenovirus-vectored vaccine against Tul4 of F. tularensis LVS.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAdenoviridaeAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesDisease Models, AnimalDNA, BacterialFemaleFrancisella tularensisLipoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNASurvival AnalysisTularemiaBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesDNA, BacterialLipoproteinsTUL4 protein, Francisella tularensisVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22278325
PMCPMC3294612
OpenAlexW2136914399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.