Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22277653›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

Distinct peptide binding specificities of Src homology 3 (SH3) protein domains can be determined by modulation of local energetics across the binding interface.

Maryna Gorelik, Alan R Davidson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interactions by Disorder - A Matter of Context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Review
  8. The PCNA interaction motifs revisited: thinking outside the PIP-box.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Article
  9. A High-ThroughputmSphere · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryna GorelikDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alan R Davidson

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-13609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast Nbp2p SH3 and Bem1p SH3b domains bind certain target peptides with similar high affinities, yet display vastly different affinities for other targets. To investigate this unusual behavior, we have solved the structure of the Nbp2p SH3-Ste20 peptide complex and compared it with the previously determined structure of the Bem1p SH3b bound to the same peptide. Although the Ste20 peptide interacts with both domains in a structurally similar manner, extensive in vitro studies with domain and peptide mutants revealed large variations in interaction strength across the binding interface of the two complexes. Whereas the Nbp2p SH3 made stronger contacts with the peptide core RXXPXXP motif, the Bem1p SH3b domain made stronger contacts with residues flanking the core motif. Remarkably, this modulation of local binding energetics can explain the distinct and highly nuanced binding specificities of these two domains.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAmino Acid SequenceCarrier ProteinsCrystallography, X-RayIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence Alignmentsrc Homology DomainsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBEM1 protein, S cerevisiaeCarrier ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesNBP2 protein, S cerevisiaePeptidesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE20 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22277653
PMCPMC3308790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.