Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22277139›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2012

Blood pressure responses to hypertension treatment and trends in cognitive function in patients with initially difficult-to-treat hypertension: a retrospective subgroup analysis of the Observational Study on Cognitive Function and SBP Reduction (OSCAR) study.

Robert J Petrella, Evgeny Shlyakhto, Alexandra O Konradi, Jean-Pascal Berrou, Armand Sedefdjian, Atul Pathak, OSCAR Publication Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Blood pressure and Purdue pegboard scores in individuals with hypertension after alternate nostril breathing, breath awareness, and no intervention.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2013
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Hypertension, brain damage and cognitive decline.Current hypertension reports · 2013
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert J PetrellaFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Evgeny ShlyakhtoFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Alexandra O KonradiFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Jean-Pascal BerrouFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Armand SedefdjianFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Atul PathakFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
OSCAR Publication GroupFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Cardiology, Lawson Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada ; 1 the VA Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood and Endocrinology, St Petersburg, Russia ; 2 Global Medical Affairs, Abbott Products Operations, Allschwil, Switzerland ; 3 Evidence Based Communication, Chemin de la Jonchère, Rueil-Malmaison, France ; 4 and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre Hospitelier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM-URM-1048, U de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 5.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRFrench Norwegian Foundation · FRLawson Health Research Institute · CARoche (Switzerland) · CHWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Observational Study on Cognitive Function and SBP Reduction (OSCAR) provided opportunities to examine the influence of eprosartan on trends in cognitive performance in a large population of patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension (DTTH). A total of 4649 patients diagnosed retrospectively with DTTH, defined as systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) ≥140/90 mm Hg despite use of at least 3 antihypertensive drugs during the month preceding the baseline visit comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort. The patients were given eprosartan-based antihypertension therapy (EBT; 600 mg/d). Blood pressure and cognitive function parameters included significant (P<.001) differences for DTTH vs non-DTTH patients such as older age, body mass index, SBP and pulse pressure (PP), and lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. After EBT for 6 months, SBP/DBP in DTTH was 138.8±12.2/81.9±7.4 (ΔSBP-26±15.7; ΔDBP-11.4±9.8); PP was 57.0±10.8 (ΔPP-14.5±13.8) (all P<.001 vs baseline and non-DTTH group). A total of 2576 patients (87.4%) responded to EBT (ie, SBP <140 mm Hg and/or ΔSBP ≥15 mm Hg, or DBP <90 mm Hg and/or ΔDBP ≥10 mm Hg); 1426 DTTH patients (48.4%) achieved normalized SBP/DBP (ie, SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg). ΔPP in DTTH-isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) was -18.0±13.3 mm Hg (P=.003 vs DTTH-systolic-diastolic hypertension). End-of-EBT mean MMSE was 27.5±3.0 (P<.001 vs baseline). Blood pressure responses after EBT coincided with stabilization/improvement of MMSE in this retrospective investigation in DTTH patients. The average improvement in MMSE in DTTH patients was similar to that in non-DTTH patients. EBT effects on PP may be relevant to the evolution of MMSE in DTTH-ISH patients.

Indexed as

AcrylatesAgedAngiotensin II Type 2 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCognitionFemaleHumansHypertensionImidazolesIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThiophenesAcrylatesAngiotensin II Type 2 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentseprosartanImidazolesThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID22277139
PMCPMC8108767
OpenAlexW1596048045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.