Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22276086›Full record

ArticleThe HUGO journal2011

The use of race, ethnicity and ancestry in human genetic research.

Sarah E Ali-Khan, Tomasz Krakowski, Rabia Tahir, Abdallah S Daar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The HUGO journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A data model for population descriptors in genomic research.American journal of human genetics · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Social determinants of health but not global genetic ancestry predict dementia prevalence in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in Black and non-Hispanic White cohorts: A contextualized review of the evidence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Review
  11. Human genetic admixture through the lens of population genomics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E Ali-Khan
Tomasz Krakowski
Rabia Tahir
Abdallah S Daar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-Human Genome Project progress has enabled a new wave of population genetic research, and intensified controversy over the use of race/ethnicity in this work. At the same time, the development of methods for inferring genetic ancestry offers more empirical means of assigning group labels. Here, we provide a systematic analysis of the use of race/ethnicity and ancestry in current genetic research. We base our analysis on key published recommendations for the use and reporting of race/ethnicity which advise that researchers: explain why the terms/categories were used and how they were measured, carefully define them, and apply them consistently. We studied 170 population genetic research articles from high impact journals, published 2008-2009. A comparative perspective was obtained by aligning study metrics with similar research from articles published 2001-2004. Our analysis indicates a marked improvement in compliance with some of the recommendations/guidelines for the use of race/ethnicity over time, while showing that important shortfalls still remain: no article using 'race', 'ethnicity' or 'ancestry' defined or discussed the meaning of these concepts in context; a third of articles still do not provide a rationale for their use, with those using 'ancestry' being the least likely to do so. Further, no article discussed potential socio-ethical implications of the reported research. As such, there remains a clear imperative for highlighting the importance of consistent and comprehensive reporting on human populations to the genetics/genomics community globally, to generate explicit guidelines for the uses of ancestry and genetic ancestry, and importantly, to ensure that guidelines are followed.

Indexed as

AncestryEthnicityGenetic ancestry inferenceGenetic researchRaceTerminology

Identifiers

PMID22276086
PMCPMC3237839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.