Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22275969›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2008

Changes in cancer incidence and mortality in England and Wales and a comparison of cancer deaths in the major developed countries by age and sex 1979-2002 in context of GDP expenditure on health.

C Pritchard, T Hickish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association Between Spending and Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality in three GDP per capita levels in China, 2013.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C PritchardProfessor in Psychiatric Social Work, School of Health & Social Care, Bournemouth University, UK, and Emeritus Professor, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK. cpritchard@bournemouth.ac.uk
T Hickish

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe successful treatment of cancer is a major health and political issue for England and Wales and the major developed countries (MDCs). All malignancy deaths by age and sex are analysed to determine how successful the MDCs were in reducing cancer mortality between the end points of 1979-81 and 2000-2, and whether there was any association between each nations 'gross domestic product expenditure on health' (GDPEH) and the reduction in their cancer deaths.

methodIncidence of cancer in England and Wales was examined for 1979-80 to 2003-4 to highlight the extent of the problem. The cancer mortality rates for England and Wales were compared with each MDC by age and sex, using 'WHO all malignancies mortality rates' for the periods of 1979-81 and 2000-2, and tests of significance were made. The GDPEH for each MDC was examined for 1980-2002, and Spearman rank-order correlations calculated to explore any association between declining cancer deaths and the GDPEH of each MDC.

resultsMen's All Age malignancy incidence in England and Wales rose 48% and women's 51%, with notable rises for females aged 15-34 and 55-74 years.Every MDC increased its GDPEH substantially; it rose to 9.3% in the United Kingdom, but the United Kingdom still remains eighth of the ten MDCs and below the MDC average (9.85%).The average number of cancer related deaths for men in England and Wales (15-74 years) was third highest in 1979-81, but fell to eighth by 2000-2. This decline was significantly greater than in seven other MDCs. Average female death rates in England and Wales were highest both in 1979-81 and in 2000-2, but declined significantly more than most MDCs in every age band from 35 to 74 years.There was a significant correlation between reduced deaths and the level of GDPEH of each nation.Male death rates declined significantly more than that of female in each MDC, with the exception of Japan and Spain.

conclusionsThe rising incidence in cancer-related deaths poses a problem for every MDC, and the poorer women's results should be a matter of concern for most MDCs. The reduction in cancer deaths reflects well on frontline services, and the significant association between reduced cancer mortality and increased GDPEH is encouraging, but still a challenge for governments, especially if the incidence continues to rise.

Indexed as

agecancerscomparisondeathsincidencesex

Identifiers

PMID22275969
PMCPMC3234042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.