Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22275958›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2007

Does LigaSure reduce fluid drainage in axillary dissection? A randomized prospective clinical trial.

M Antonio, T Pietra, Lg Domenico, D Massimo, R Ignazio, N Antonio, C Luigi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Efficacy and safety of LigaSure™ small jaw instrument in thyroidectomy: a 1-year prospective observational study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AntonioDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Clinical Application, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
T Pietra
Lg Domenico
D Massimo
R Ignazio
N Antonio
C Luigi
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is an integral part of breast cancer treatment. It is required in about 40-50% of patients. The placement of a drain in the axilla after an operation is current surgical practice. Short surgical stay programmes increase operating efficiency and reduce medical care costs, without compromising quality of care. LigaSure(™) is a new haemostatic device that uses bipolar energy to seal vessels. The aim of this study is to determine whether axillary dissection with LigaSure(™) reduces the time of wound drainage, the duration of surgical intervention and the volume of drainage after treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 women with breast cancer who needed axillary dissection were randomized into the LigaSure(™) or conventional axillary dissection group. Levels I to III lymph node dissection was performed. A closed suction drain was always placed in the axilla and removed after 6-8 days or when fluid amount was <60 cc in the previous 24 hours.

resultsTHERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS WHEN CONSIDERING THE DURATION OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE: average duration was 70.7 ± 24.66 minutes for LigaSure(™) patients, while in the conventional dissection group the mean was 70.6 ± 22.47 minutes (p=0.98). Total amount of drained fluid was 624.49 cc in the LigaSure(™) axillary dissection group and 792.96 in the conventional ALND group; this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.09); the duration of draining was also similar, with no statistical difference (p=0.15).

conclusionsThe present study did not show clear advantages in LigaSure(™) use for ALND, although it represents a good haemostatic device, especially in abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

axillary dissectionbreast cancer surgeryBreast carcinomadrainhaemostasisLigaSureseroma

Identifiers

PMID22275958
PMCPMC3223974
OpenAlexW2064879103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.