Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22275907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2011

Treatment of Essential Tremor: Are there Issues We are Overlooking?

Elan D Louis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Selective loss of the GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elan D LouisGertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ESSENTIAL TREMORR01NS039422 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LOUIS, ELAN D · 2000 to 2013
$7.7M
Pathogenesis Of Essential Tremor: Cerebellar MetabolismR01NS042859 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LOUIS, ELAN D · 2003 to 2012
$4.9M
Pathogenesis of Essential Tremor: Cerebellar MetabolismR56NS042859 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LOUIS, ELAN D · 2008 to 2008
$500k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039422NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042859NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS042859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEssential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological diseases. Although a large number of medications have been tested, there are only two first-line medications, primidone and propranolol, which is a situation that has not changed in approximately 30 years. Several recent reviews have summarized the current pharmacotherapeutic options for ET and the approach to the management of ET patients. Yet there remain a number of important issues, both scientific and clinical, that have not been broached in the literature and that have therapeutic implications.

objectivesTo introduce several clinical and scientific issues that have not formally entered the published literature on the treatment of ET.

methodsIn September 2011, materials for this article were gathered during a literature search of PubMed using the following terms: ET, clinical, clinical trial, treatment, medications, therapeutics. English-language articles were selected for further review.

resultsThe paper focuses on several topics that have received scant or no discussion in the published literature on ET therapeutics. These topics are as follows: the nature of the underlying disease pathophysiology, the presence of pathological heterogeneity, the complexity of cellular and neurochemical changes which may be underlying this disorder, the presence of clinical heterogeneity, the selection of treatment endpoints, the effects of diagnostic uncertainty, the presence of cognitive and psychiatric features in ET, the identification of possible modifiable risk factors, and the absence of any neuroprotective therapies.

conclusionThe author has identified several topics that have received scant or no discussion in the published literature on ET therapeutics. Further discussion of the issues raised here may lead to improvements in clinical trial methodologies as well as facilitate the development of fresh approaches to pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

clinicalessential tremorpharmacologytreatment

Identifiers

PMID22275907
PMCPMC3257846
OpenAlexW2117257464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.