Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22275519›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2012

Genome-wide analysis of syntenic gene deletion in the grasses.

James C Schnable, Michael Freeling, Eric Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Study of GUS Expression inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of receptor-like proteins induced byFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. RGPDB: database of root-associated genes and promoters in maize, soybean, and sorghum.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  13. The Sorghum QTL Atlas: a powerful tool for trait dissection, comparative genomics and crop improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison ofThe Plant cell · 2018
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James C SchnableDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California-Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michael Freeling
Eric Lyons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The grasses, Poaceae, are one of the largest and most successful angiosperm families. Like many radiations of flowering plants, the divergence of the major grass lineages was preceded by a whole-genome duplication (WGD), although these events are not rare for flowering plants. By combining identification of syntenic gene blocks with measures of gene pair divergence and different frequencies of ancient gene loss, we have separated the two subgenomes present in modern grasses. Reciprocal loss of duplicated genes or genomic regions has been hypothesized to reproductively isolate populations and, thus, speciation. However, in contrast to previous studies in yeast and teleost fishes, we found very little evidence of reciprocal loss of homeologous genes between the grasses, suggesting that post-WGD gene loss may not be the cause of the grass radiation. The sets of homeologous and orthologous genes and predicted locations of deleted genes identified in this study, as well as links to the CoGe comparative genomics web platform for analyzing pan-grass syntenic regions, are provided along with this paper as a resource for the grass genetics community.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DeletionGene DuplicationGenome, PlantPoaceaePolyploidySynteny

Identifiers

PMID22275519
PMCPMC3318446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.