Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22274951›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Comparison of two dosing schedules of palonosetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting due to interleukin-2-based biochemotherapy.

Rahat Noor, Agop Y Bedikian, Sandy Mahoney, Roland Bassett, Kevin Kim, Nicholas Papadopoulos, Wen-Jen Hwu, Patrick Hwu, Jade Homsi

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahat NoorDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Agop Y Bedikian
Sandy Mahoney
Roland Bassett
Kevin Kim
Nicholas Papadopoulos
Wen-Jen Hwu
Patrick Hwu
Jade Homsi
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of metastatic melanoma with interleukin-2-based biochemotherapy involves administration of a combination of moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapies over 5 days. Corticosteroids for the prevention of biochemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are contraindicated because they cause lysis of LAK cells produced in response to interleukin-2. Palonosetron is a long-acting, highly potent, second-generation serotonin receptor antagonist. The recommended dosing schedule of palonosetron for the control of CINV due to biochemotherapy is not known.

methodsIn a phase II design, treatment-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing the first cycle of biochemotherapy were randomized to receive palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously for CINV prophylaxis on either days 1 and 4 (schedule 1) or days 1, 3, and 5 (schedule 2). All patients received dacarbazine on day 1, cisplatin, vinblastine, and interleukin-2 on days 1-4, and interferon alpha-2b on days 1-5. We evaluated and compared, by palonosetron dosing schedule, the pattern and the severity of CINV during the first 7 days of treatment and the duration of the 21-day cycle as well as the impact on daily function with the Functional Living Index-Emesis.

resultsThirty patients (median age 53 years) were enrolled. Eighteen (60%) were men. A consistent trend of a better control of both nausea and vomiting favoring schedule 2 was observed during the first 7 days and throughout the cycle. Significantly more patients experienced nausea on any day during the first 7 days on schedule 1 (mean number of episodes 8.1 ± 1.5) than on schedule 2 (mean number of episodes 5.6 ± 2.3, p = 0.028). The impact on daily function was similar between the two groups.

conclusionsBoth dosing schedules of palonosetron were tolerated well. Alternate day dosing of palonosetron was more effective in controlling CINV in this patient population.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInterleukin-2IsoquinolinesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNauseaPalonosetronQuinuclidinesSerotonin AntagonistsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsInterleukin-2IsoquinolinesPalonosetronQuinuclidinesSerotonin Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22274951
OpenAlexW2069108472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.