Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22274577›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2012

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in females with faecal incontinence: the impact of sphincter morphology and rectal sensation on the clinical outcome.

A Hotouras, M A Thaha, M E Allison, A Currie, S M Scott, C L H Chan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05016453 (Long-term Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence and New Approach for Partial Responders), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05016453 completednot on this map

Long-term Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence and New Approach for Partial Responders

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2010 to 2021Enrolled139ConditionsFaecal Incontinence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A HotourasAcademic Surgical Unit, Barts and The London NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. alex007@doctors.org.uk
M A Thaha
M E Allison
A Currie
S M Scott
C L H Chan
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an acceptable second line treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) unresponsive to conservative measures. There is however a paucity of data in the literature regarding its efficacy. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of PTNS in an exclusively female cohort of patients and to identify factors that may predict treatment response.

methodA prospective cohort of female patients with FI underwent evaluation of sphincter morphology, anorectal pressures and rectal sensation as part of their physiologic assessment prior to treatment. PTNS was performed according to a specific departmental protocol. The clinical outcomes measured were: (1) Cleveland Clinic incontinence scores, (2) deferment time and (3) weekly incontinence episodes. Outcomes were compared at baseline and following treatment using appropriate statistical tests. Clinical outcomes were correlated with the results of the anorectal physiology testing (i.e. sphincter morphology, rectal sensation).

resultsEighty-eight female patients with a mean age of 58.0 ± 13.6 years were included in the analysis. FI was predominantly a late consequence of obstetric injury. The mean incontinence score improved from 12.2 ± 4.0 at baseline to 9.1 ± 4.6 following treatment (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant improvements were also seen in the median deferment time and median number of weekly incontinence episodes. Sphincter damage and altered rectal sensation did not appear to influence the outcomes.

conclusionsPTNS is an effective treatment in female patients with FI. Improvements in clinical outcomes were independent of damage to the anal sphincter complex in patients with normal rectal sensation.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAnal CanalDemographyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRectumSensationTibial NerveTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22274577
OpenAlexW2001688921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.