Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22274364›Full record

ArticleOptics express2012

Quantitative sectioning and noise analysis for structured illumination microscopy.

Nathan Hagen, Liang Gao, Tomasz S Tkaczyk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics express, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New 1,3-Disubstituted Benzo[Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Any Way You Slice It-A Comparison of Confocal Microscopy Techniques.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathan HagenDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. nhagen@optics.arizona.edu
Liang Gao
Tomasz S Tkaczyk

Funding

Integrated Bi-FOV Endoscope for Detection of PrecancerR01CA124319 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI TKACZYK, TOMASZ S · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Image Slicing Spectrometer (ISS) for high resolution sub-cellular microscopyR21EB009186 · NIBIB · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI TKACZYK, TOMASZ S · 2008 to 2009
$383k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124319NCI NIH HHS R01-CA124319NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB009186NIBIB NIH HHS R21-EB009186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured illumination (SI) has long been regarded as a nonquantitative technique for obtaining sectioned microscopic images. Its lack of quantitative results has restricted the use of SI sectioning to qualitative imaging experiments, and has also limited researchers' ability to compare SI against competing sectioning methods such as confocal microscopy. We show how to modify the standard SI sectioning algorithm to make the technique quantitative, and provide formulas for calculating the noise in the sectioned images. The results indicate that, for an illumination source providing the same spatially-integrated photon flux at the object plane, and for the same effective slice thicknesses, SI sectioning can provide higher SNR images than confocal microscopy for an equivalent setup when the modulation contrast exceeds about 0.09.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLightingMicroscopySignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID22274364
PMCPMC3336372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.