Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22273739›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Structural and dynamic aspects of protein clocks: how can they be so slow and stable?

Shuji Akiyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structure-function relationship of KaiC around dawn.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regulation mechanisms of the dual ATPase in KaiC.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AcceleratingBiophysics and physicobiology · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shuji AkiyamaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusaku, Nagoya, Japan. akiyama@bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KaiC is a core protein of the cyanobacterial Kai oscillator, which persists without transcription-translation feedback. In the presence of KaiA and KaiB, KaiC reveals rhythmic activation/inactivation of its ATPase and autokinase/autophosphotase activities over approximately 24 h. Since the in vitro reconstruction of the Kai oscillator, the structures and functions of the Kai proteins have been studied extensively. Each protein's crystal structure and low-resolution views of Kai complexes have been reported. In addition, newer data are emerging on dynamic aspects such as assembly/disassembly of the Kai components and a ticking motion of KaiC, which is probably coupled to its slow, temperature-compensated ATPase activity. The accumulated evidence offers an ideal opportunity to revisit a fundamental question regarding biological circadian clocks: what determines the temperature-compensated 24 h period? In this review, I summarize the current understanding of the Kai oscillator's molecular mechanism and discuss emerging ideas on protein clocks.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsCircadian ClocksCircadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesTemperatureTime FactorsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsCircadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKaiB protein, cyanobacteriaKaiC protein, cyanobacteriaMultiprotein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID22273739
PMCPMC11114763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.