ArticleThe patient2008
Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.
Article in The patient, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Pooled it
- Cancer survivor preferences for breast cancer follow-up care: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Physician Preferences for Universal Routine Depression Screening for Adolescents in Primary Care.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Role Preferences in Medical Decision Making: Relevance and Implications for Health Preference Research.The patient · 2024Article
- Preferences for Attributes of Initial COVID-19 Diagnosis in the United States and China During the Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment With Propensity Score Matching.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- People's preferences for self-management support.Health services research · 2022Article
- Systematic Review of Studies Using Conjoint Analysis Techniques to Investigate Patients' Preferences Regarding Osteoarthritis Treatment.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Review
- Shared Decision Making: From Decision Science to Data Science.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020Article
- A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care.The patient · 2016Article
- Learning to Manage Chronic Pain: The Patients' Perspective.Pain and therapy · 2016Article
- Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Modeling mental health information preferences during the early adult years: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.Journal of health communication · 2014Article
- A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013Article
- Modeling organizational justice improvements in a pediatric health service : a discrete-choice conjoint experiment.The patient · 2013Article
- Elicitation of ostomy pouch preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.The patient · 2011Article
- Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: a new patient-centered approach to the assessment of health service preferences.The patient · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA consensus regarding the components of a patient-centered approach to healthcare does not exist. Although patient-centered care should be predicated on patient preferences, existing models provide little evidence regarding the relative importance of different care processes to patients themselves.
objectiveTo involve patients in the design of a model of patient-centered care for a corporation of Canadian teaching hospitals.
methodsUsing themes from focus groups and interviews, a conjoint survey was developed comprising 14 four-level patient-centered care attributes. Sawtooth Software's Choice Based Conjoint module (version 2.6.7) was used to design the survey. Each participant completed 15 choice tasks, each task presenting a choice between three hospitals described by a different combination of patient-centered care attribute levels. Latent class analysis was used to identify segments of participants with similar patient-centered care choice patterns. Randomized First Choice simulations were used to predict the percentage of participants in each segment who would choose different approaches to improving patient-centered care.Representative hospital service users were recruited from a corporation of five Canadian teaching hospitals serving a regional population of 2.2 million.
resultsA total of 508 patients and family members of children completed a choice-based conjoint survey. Latent class analysis revealed two segments: an informed care segment and a convenient care segment. Participants in the informed care segment (71.3% of the sample) were more likely to have higher education, be non-immigrants, speak English as a first language, and be outpatients or family members.The information needed to understand health concerns, an opportunity to learn health improvement skills, teams that communicated effectively, short waiting times, and collaborative treatment planning were more important to the informed care segment than to the convenient care segment. Convenient settings, a welcoming environment, and ease of internal access exerted a greater influence on the choices made by the convenient care segment. Both segments preferred hospitals that provided health information and gave prompt feedback on patient progress.
conclusionsThis study suggests that many patients would exchange an increase in waiting times for prompt feedback, information, and the skills to improve their health.
Identifiers
22272999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.