Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22272924›Full record

ArticleThe patient2008

Hormonal contraceptive users' self-reported benefits, adverse reactions, and fears in 2001 and 2007.

Miia Tiihonen, Hanna-Mari Leppänen, Anna-Mari Heikkinen, Riitta Ahonen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miia Tiihonen1 Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland 2 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Hanna-Mari Leppänen
Anna-Mari Heikkinen
Riitta Ahonen
University of Eastern Finland · FIKuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHormonal contraceptives (HCs) are the most common contraceptive method in western countries. The fears and problems experienced by users of HCs can have an impact on their quality of life, and lead to abortions and unwanted pregnancies.

objectiveTo investigate whether experiences and perceptions of HC users in Finland have changed from 2001 to 2007.

methodsData were collected using questionnaire surveys of women using HCs in 2001 and 2007. In Finland, HCs are available with a physician's prescription, and are only supplied in community and university pharmacies. University pharmacies in 12 large cities across Finland were selected to distribute the questionnaires. The response rate was 53% (n = 264) in 2001 and 55% (n = 436) in 2007. The average age of the respondents was 26 years in both surveys. The surveys measured self-reported benefits and adverse reactions, preconceptions, fears, knowledge, and opinions.

resultsThe number of HC users reporting fears increased from 2001 to 2007 (p = 0.002), whereas the number of HC users reporting adverse reactions decreased (p = 0.013). In both surveys, the most common fear was infertility after HC use (17% vs 26% for 2001 and 2007, respectively). In both surveys, the most common benefits were efficacy and regular menstrual cycle, and the most common adverse reactions were mood swings, lowered libido, and weight gain.

conclusionsOur study suggests that, although women using HCs were convinced about their benefits, and the number of users reporting adverse reactions had decreased from 2001 to 2007, the number of users reporting fears had increased. Healthcare professionals need to provide counseling in order to alleviate women's fears and to correct false perceptions of HCs.

Identifiers

PMID22272924
OpenAlexW2034642071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.