ArticleThe patient2008
Hormonal contraceptive users' self-reported benefits, adverse reactions, and fears in 2001 and 2007.
Article in The patient, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Information sources used by women in Finland who use hormonal contraceptives.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2010Article
- The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept.Journal of sex researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHormonal contraceptives (HCs) are the most common contraceptive method in western countries. The fears and problems experienced by users of HCs can have an impact on their quality of life, and lead to abortions and unwanted pregnancies.
objectiveTo investigate whether experiences and perceptions of HC users in Finland have changed from 2001 to 2007.
methodsData were collected using questionnaire surveys of women using HCs in 2001 and 2007. In Finland, HCs are available with a physician's prescription, and are only supplied in community and university pharmacies. University pharmacies in 12 large cities across Finland were selected to distribute the questionnaires. The response rate was 53% (n = 264) in 2001 and 55% (n = 436) in 2007. The average age of the respondents was 26 years in both surveys. The surveys measured self-reported benefits and adverse reactions, preconceptions, fears, knowledge, and opinions.
resultsThe number of HC users reporting fears increased from 2001 to 2007 (p = 0.002), whereas the number of HC users reporting adverse reactions decreased (p = 0.013). In both surveys, the most common fear was infertility after HC use (17% vs 26% for 2001 and 2007, respectively). In both surveys, the most common benefits were efficacy and regular menstrual cycle, and the most common adverse reactions were mood swings, lowered libido, and weight gain.
conclusionsOur study suggests that, although women using HCs were convinced about their benefits, and the number of users reporting adverse reactions had decreased from 2001 to 2007, the number of users reporting fears had increased. Healthcare professionals need to provide counseling in order to alleviate women's fears and to correct false perceptions of HCs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.