Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22272718›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

The core and unique proteins of haloarchaea.

Melinda D Capes, Priya DasSarma, Shiladitya DasSarma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome sequence and methylome profile ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Genomics ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. 'All About' Extremophiles.Faculty reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Genomic and physiological analysis of CJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Article
  9. Genome Sequence of the Early 20th-Century Extreme HalophileMicrobiology resource announcements · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Methylomes of Two Extremely HalophilicMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  19. Genome Sequence and Methylation Patterns ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melinda D CapesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA.
Priya DasSarma
Shiladitya DasSarma
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the first genome of a halophilic archaeon was sequenced in 2000, biologists have been advancing the understanding of genomic characteristics that allow for survival in the harsh natural environments of these organisms. An increase in protein acidity and GC-bias in the genome have been implicated as factors in tolerance to extreme salinity, desiccation, and high solar radiation. However, few previous attempts have been made to identify novel genes that would permit survival in such extreme conditions.

resultsWith the recent release of several new complete haloarchaeal genome sequences, we have conducted a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis focusing on the identification of unique haloarchaeal conserved proteins that likely play key roles in environmental adaptation. Using bioinformatic methods, we have clustered 31,312 predicted proteins from nine haloarchaeal genomes into 4,455 haloarchaeal orthologous groups (HOGs). We assigned likely functions by association with established COG and KOG databases in NCBI. After identifying homologs in four additional haloarchaeal genomes, we determined that there were 784 core haloarchaeal protein clusters (cHOGs), of which 83 clusters were found primarily in haloarchaea. Further analysis found that 55 clusters were truly unique (tucHOGs) to haloarchaea and qualify as signature proteins while 28 were nearly unique (nucHOGs), the vast majority of which were coded for on the haloarchaeal chromosomes. Of the signature proteins, only one example with any predicted function, Ral, involved in desiccation/radiation tolerance in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, was identified. Among the core clusters, 33% was predicted to function in metabolism, 25% in information transfer and storage, 10% in cell processes and signaling, and 22% belong to poorly characterized or general function groups.

conclusionOur studies have established conserved groups of nearly 800 protein clusters present in all haloarchaea, with a subset of 55 which are predicted to be accessory proteins that may be critical or essential for success in an extreme environment. These studies support core and signature genes and proteins as valuable concepts for understanding phylogenetic and phenotypic characteristics of coherent groups of organisms.

Indexed as

Archaeal ProteinsChromosomes, ArchaealCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticGenome, ArchaealHalobacteriumral GTP-Binding ProteinsArchaeal Proteinsral GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22272718
PMCPMC3287961
OpenAlexW2157174771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.