Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22272291›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Encoding odorant identity by spiking packets of rate-invariant neurons in awake mice.

Olivier Gschwend, Jonathan Beroud, Alan Carleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Temporal Response Properties of Accessory Olfactory Bulb Neurons: Limitations and Opportunities for Decoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Behavioral Status Influences the Dependence of Odorant-Induced Change in Firing on Prestimulus Firing Rate.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olivier GschwendDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jonathan Beroud
Alan Carleton

Funding

European Research Council 243344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow do neural networks encode sensory information? Following sensory stimulation, neural coding is commonly assumed to be based on neurons changing their firing rate. In contrast, both theoretical works and experiments in several sensory systems showed that neurons could encode information as coordinated cell assemblies by adjusting their spike timing and without changing their firing rate. Nevertheless, in the olfactory system, there is little experimental evidence supporting such model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo study these issues, we implanted tetrodes in the olfactory bulb of awake mice to record the odorant-evoked activity of mitral/tufted (M/T) cells. We showed that following odorant presentation, most M/T neurons do not significantly change their firing rate over a breathing cycle but rather respond to odorant stimulation by redistributing their firing activity within respiratory cycles. In addition, we showed that sensory information can be encoded by cell assemblies composed of such neurons, thus supporting the idea that coordinated populations of globally rate-invariant neurons could be efficiently used to convey information about the odorant identity. We showed that different coding schemes can convey high amount of odorant information for specific read-out time window. Finally we showed that the optimal readout time window corresponds to the duration of gamma oscillations cycles.

conclusionWe propose that odorant can be encoded by population of cells that exhibit fine temporal tuning of spiking activity while displaying weak or no firing rate change. These cell assemblies may transfer sensory information in spiking packets sequence using the gamma oscillations as a clock. This would allow the system to reach a tradeoff between rapid and accurate odorant discrimination.

Indexed as

OdorantsAction PotentialsAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectrodes, ImplantedElectrophysiologyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsOlfactory BulbTime FactorsWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID22272291
PMCPMC3260228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.