Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22272183›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2012

Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in flowering plant mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates.

Daniel B Sloan, Andrew J Alverson, John P Chuckalovcak, Martin Wu, David E McCauley, Jeffrey D Palmer, Douglas R Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 408 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
408citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

408 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

348 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel B SloanDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America. daniel.sloan@yale.edu
Andrew J Alverson
John P Chuckalovcak
Martin Wu
David E McCauley
Jeffrey D Palmer
Douglas R Taylor

Funding

Horizontal Gene Transfer in Multicellular EukaryotesR01GM070612 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PALMER, JEFFREY D · 2005 to 2008
$1.6M
Evolutionary Genomics of Supersized Mitochondrial GenomesF32GM080079 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI ALVERSON, ANDREW J · 2007 to 2009
$148k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM080079NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM080079NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070612NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM-70612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size and complexity vary tremendously among eukaryotic species and their organelles. Comparisons across deeply divergent eukaryotic lineages have suggested that variation in mutation rates may explain this diversity, with increased mutational burdens favoring reduced genome size and complexity. The discovery that mitochondrial mutation rates can differ by orders of magnitude among closely related angiosperm species presents a unique opportunity to test this hypothesis. We sequenced the mitochondrial genomes from two species in the angiosperm genus Silene with recent and dramatic accelerations in their mitochondrial mutation rates. Contrary to theoretical predictions, these genomes have experienced a massive proliferation of noncoding content. At 6.7 and 11.3 Mb, they are by far the largest known mitochondrial genomes, larger than most bacterial genomes and even some nuclear genomes. In contrast, two slowly evolving Silene mitochondrial genomes are smaller than average for angiosperms. Consequently, this genus captures approximately 98% of known variation in organelle genome size. The expanded genomes reveal several architectural changes, including the evolution of complex multichromosomal structures (with 59 and 128 circular-mapping chromosomes, ranging in size from 44 to 192 kb). They also exhibit a substantial reduction in recombination and gene conversion activity as measured by the relative frequency of alternative genome conformations and the level of sequence divergence between repeat copies. The evolution of mutation rate, genome size, and chromosome structure can therefore be extremely rapid and interrelated in ways not predicted by current evolutionary theories. Our results raise the hypothesis that changes in recombinational processes, including gene conversion, may be a central force driving the evolution of both mutation rate and genome structure.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMutation RateChromosomes, PlantFlowersGenes, PlantGenome, MitochondrialGenome, PlantGenome SizeINDEL MutationInheritance PatternsMitochondrial ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataNucleotidesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticMitochondrial ProteinsNucleotidesPlant ProteinsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22272183
PMCPMC3260318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.