Global Fund needs to address conflict of interest.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. What motivates physicians to propose private services in a mixed private-public healthcare system? A mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2022
   Article
2. Promoting population health with public-private partnerships: Where's the evidence?BMC public health · 2019
   Review
3. The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community.Sustainability science · 2019
   Article
4. Support of public-private partnerships in health promotion and conflicts of interest.BMJ open · 2016
   Review
5. Addiction industry studies: understanding how proconsumption influences block effective interventions.American journal of public health · 2013
   Article
6. Corporate philanthropy, political influence, and health policy.PloS one · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Global Fund collusion with liquor giant is a clear conflict of interest.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as