ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012
In vitro potency and in vivo efficacy of a novel bis-indole antimicrobial compound in reducing catheter colonization.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo Activity of Combination of N-acetyl Cysteine and Levofloxacin against Colonization and Catheter-Associated Infection.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Synthesis, anti-leishmanial and molecular docking study of bis-indole derivatives.BMC chemistry · 2019Article
- Discovery of 3,3'-diindolylmethanes as potent antileishmanial agents.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular catheters coated with a novel antimicrobial agent (MBX1631) were studied for their ability to protect against bacterial colonization in vitro and in a rabbit model. MBX1631-coated catheters were significantly less likely to become colonized than control catheters both in vitro and in vivo (P < 0.001). Furthermore, device-associated infection was significantly lower in MBX1631-coated catheters than in uncoated ones (P < 0.005).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.