Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22271609›Full record

ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2012

Applying anthropology to eliminate tobacco-related health disparities.

Kate Goldade, Diana Burgess, Abimbola Olayinka, Guy Lucien S Whembolua, Kolawole S Okuyemi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imagining Global Health with Justice: In Defense of the Right to Health.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2015
    Article
  7. Reigniting tobacco ritual: waterpipe tobacco smoking establishment culture in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate GoldadeProgram in Health Disparities Research, Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. kgoldade@umn.edu
Diana Burgess
Abimbola Olayinka
Guy Lucien S Whembolua
Kolawole S Okuyemi
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Improving Varenicline Adherence and Outcome in Homeless SmokersR01HL081522 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI OKUYEMI, KOLAWOLE S · 2007 to 2018
$6.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL081522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisparities in tobacco's harm persist. Declines in smoking among the general population have not been experienced to the same extent by vulnerable populations. Innovative strategies are required to diminish disparities in tobacco's harm. As novel tools, anthropological concepts and methods may be applied to improve the design and outcomes of tobacco cessation interventions.

methodsWe reviewed over 60 articles published in peer-reviewed journals since 1995 for content on anthropology and smoking cessation. The specific questions framing the review were: (a) "How can lessons learned from anthropological studies of smoking improve the design and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions?" (b) How can anthropology be applied to diminish disparities in smoking cessation? and (c) How can qualitative methods be used most effectively in smoking cessation intervention research?

resultsThree specific disciplinary tools were identified and examined: (a) culture, (b) reflexivity, and (c) qualitative methods. Examining culture as a dynamic influence and understanding the utilities of smoking in a particular group is a precursor to promoting cessation. Reflexivity enables a deeper understanding of how smokers perceive quitting and smoking beyond addiction and individual health consequences. Qualitative methods may be used to elicit in-depth perspectives on quitting, insights to inform existing community-based strategies for making behavior changes, and detailed preferences for cessation treatment or programs.

conclusionsAnthropological tools can be used to improve the effectiveness of intervention research studies targeting individuals from vulnerable groups. Synthesized applications of anthropological concepts can be used to facilitate translation of findings into clinical practice for providers addressing tobacco cessation in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesSmoking PreventionAnthropology, MedicalCultureDatabases, FactualHealth PromotionHumansProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSmokingSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID22271609
PMCPMC3430467
OpenAlexW2122474984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.