ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2012
The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive process model of clinical information interaction in primary care: results of a "best-fit" framework synthesis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- The UTHealth Houston Adult Cardiovascular Genomics Certificate Program: Efficacy and Impact on Healthcare Professionals.Research square · 2024Article
- Advancing health equity: A qualitative study assessing barriers and facilitators of implementing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk screening tools in community-based organizations.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Article
- Updates in gynecologic care for individuals with lynch syndrome.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Barriers and strategies to integrate medical genetics and primary care in underserved populations: a scoping review.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Executive Summary of the Early-Onset Breast Cancer Evidence Review Conference.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Review
- Development of an Algorithm for Determining of Genetic Risk at the Primary Healthcare Level - A New Tool for Primary Prevention: A Study Protocol.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2020Article
- Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Evaluating and improving the implementation of a community-based hereditary cancer screening program.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Supporting genetics in primary care: investigating how theory can inform professional education.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Non-genetic health professionals' attitude towards, knowledge of and skills in discussing and ordering genetic testing for hereditary cancer.Familial cancer · 2016Article
- Community-Based Family Health History Education: The Role of State Health Agencies in Engaging Medically Underserved Populations in Understanding Genomics and Risk of Chronic Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Psychological impact of family history risk assessment in primary care: a mixed methods study.Family practice · 2014Article
- Providing patient education: impact on quantity and quality of family health history collection.Familial cancer · 2014Article
- Quality of family history collection with use of a patient facing family history assessment tool.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Engaging Men With BRCA-Related Cancer Risks: Practical Advice for BRCA Risk Management From Male Stakeholders.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary care providers (PCPs) offered input regarding the incorporation of a family health history (FHH) risk assessment tool into a community health care system (CHCS). Sixteen PCPs participated in one of three focus groups. Perceived impediments included the lack of standard screening guidelines, effective screening tests, genetic counseling resources, and services for high-risk patients. The PCPs were concerned about their level of expertise, the cost of preventive health care, and genetic discrimination. They also were concerned about the use of a FHH tool by oncologists within the CHCS because of communication gaps between oncologists and PCPs, lack of clarity regarding follow-up and legal liability, and reimbursement issues. To integrate a FHH tool into a CHCS, PCPs will need consultation and referral services, evidence-based recommendations, and "just-in-time" educational resources. Oncologists who use the tool will need to develop a streamlined communication system with PCPs, establish clearly defined roles, and ensure patient follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22271379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.