ArticleNeurocritical care2012
Fast-track intubation for accelerated interventional stroke treatment.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Mechanical thrombectomy using a combined CT/C-arm X-ray system.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2016Article
- [Peri-interventional management of acute endovascular stroke treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- Management of the Interventional Stroke Patient.Current treatment options in neurology · 2015Article
- To Tube or Not to Tube? The Role of Intubation during Stroke Thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs intravenous thrombolysis frequently fails to recanalize occluded proximal intracerebral arteries, interventional recanalization therapy is increasingly being considered as treatment option in acute ischemic stroke patients. The optimal periprocedural patient management for these interventions is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to identify factors delaying door-to-treatment times, and to evaluate the effect of a fast-track intubation standard operating procedure (I-SOP) on door-to-angiography time.
methodsFirst, we retrospectively reviewed records of 48 acute stroke patients who were treated by interventional recanalization of intracranial occlusions between 2006 and 2009 at our institution. Time to angiography was defined as time from hospital admission to the beginning of the angiographic procedure. Second, an I-SOP for fast-track intubation was implemented and effects on door-to-angiography time were prospectively analyzed in 23 consecutive patients.
resultsIn the retrospective dataset (n = 48), the mean door-to-angiography time was 2.2 ± 0.1 h (mean ± SEM). A clinically relevant time loss attributable to the intubation procedure was suggested by a 51 ± 21 min shorter door-to-angiography time for patients already intubated prior to admission (P = 0.0189). Additional factors associated with a prolonged door-to-angiography time were: door-to-diagnosis time (P < 0.001), onset-to-door time (P = 0.0117), and male gender (mean difference +27 ± 15 min, P = 0.0822). In the prospective dataset (n = 23), I-SOP implementation reduced mean door-to-angiography time by 25 ± 10 min (P = 0.0164).
conclusionsIn acute stroke patients, intubation prior to interventional recanalization therapy can delay treatment initiation. The implementation of an I-SOP accelerates interventional treatment initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.