Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22271178›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2012

Single-cell and regional gene expression analysis in Alzheimer's disease.

Ruby Kwong, Michelle K Lupton, Michal Janitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruby KwongSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michelle K Lupton
Michal Janitz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical manifestations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are secondary to the substantial loss of cortical neurons. To be effective, neuroprotective strategies will need to target the primary pathogenic mechanisms of AD prior to cell loss. The differences between neurons are largely determined by their specific repertoire of mRNAs. Thus, transcriptomic analyses that do not assume a priori etiological hypotheses are potentially powerful tools that can be used to understand the pathogenesis of complex diseases, including AD. The human brain comprises thousands of different cell types of both neuronal and non-neuronal origins. Information about individual cell-type-specific gene expression patterns will allow for a better understanding of the mechanisms that govern the progression of AD, which may lead to new therapeutic targets for prevention and treatment of the disease. This review provides an overview of the current technologies in use and the developments for single-cell extraction and transcriptome analysis. Recent transcriptome profiling studies on individual AD-afflicted brain cells are also discussed.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainHumansNeuronsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID22271178
PMCPMC11498600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.