Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22271074›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2013

Voxel classification and graph cuts for automated segmentation of pathological periprosthetic hip anatomy.

Daniel F Malan, Charl P Botha, Edward R Valstar

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel F MalanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, J11-R, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. fmalan@medvis.org
Charl P Botha
Edward R Valstar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutomated patient-specific image-based segmentation of tissues surrounding aseptically loose hip prostheses is desired. For this we present an automated segmentation pipeline that labels periprosthetic tissues in computed tomography (CT). The intended application of this pipeline is in pre-operative planning.

methodsIndividual voxels were classified based on a set of automatically extracted image features. Minimum-cost graph cuts were computed on the classification results. The graph-cut step enabled us to enforce geometrical containment constraints, such as cortical bone sheathing the femur's interior. The solution's novelty lies in the combination of voxel classification with multilabel graph cuts and in the way label costs were defined to enforce containment constraints.

resultsThe segmentation pipeline was tested on a set of twelve manually segmented clinical CT volumes. The distribution of healthy tissue and bone cement was automatically determined with sensitivities greater than 82% and pathological fibrous interface tissue with a sensitivity exceeding 73%. Specificity exceeded 96% for all tissues.

conclusionsThe addition of a graph-cut step improved segmentation compared to voxel classification alone. The pipeline described in this paper represents a practical approach to segmenting multitissue regions from CT.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHip ProsthesisHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalOsteoarthritis, HipPattern Recognition, AutomatedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.