ArticleWorld journal of surgery2012
Retromuscular mesh repair of midline incisional hernia with polyester standard mesh: monocentric experience of 261 consecutive patients with a 5-year follow-up.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right Colectomy with Absorbable Mesh Repair as a Salvage Solution for the Management of Giant Incisional Hernia with Loss of Domain: Results of a Bicentric Study.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Standard of Open Surgical Repair of Suprapubic Incisional Hernias.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Revisiting the Anterior Rectus Sheath Repair for Incisional Hernia: A 10-Year Experience.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Lateral incisional hernia repair by the retromuscular approach with polyester standard mesh: topographic considerations and long-term follow-up of 61 consecutive patients.World journal of surgery · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidline incisional hernia (MIH) repair remains a major challenge for surgeons. Multiple procedures and types of mesh to treat incisional hernia are available. We evaluated outcomes of MIH treated by retromuscular mesh repair (RMR) using a polyester standard prosthesis. PATIENTS: A total of 262 patients were treated for MIH by RMR between June 2000 and November 2007 in an academic tertiary referral center using the same standardized surgical technique and one type of mesh. The early complications and recurrence rate were evaluated.
resultsThe average patient age was 57 years; 51% were women. The mean width was 7.8 cm and defect size was 61 cm². Previous MIH repair had been performed in 23% of the patients. Average hospital stay was 7 days. Of the 262 patients studied, 34 patients (13%) developed early complications, and 16 required reoperation for various indications. Early mesh infection occurred in 2 patients (0.8%) requiring mesh removal. The mean follow-up was 58 months. Recurrence was observed in 8 patients (3%) with an average delay of 19 months. There was a significant difference in terms of recurrence in patients with mesh infection versus the group who did not develop infection (2/2 patients versus 6/259; P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur results suggest that RMR with a polyester standard prosthesis for MIH remains a safe "classic" treatment with a moderate complication rate and a low infection and recurrence rate, even in large incisional hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.