Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22270892›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2012

[Fall and fracture prevention based on the National Expert Standard. Implementation and costs in a real world setting in nursing homes].

S Heinrich, I Weigelt, K Rapp, C Becker, U Rissmann, H-H König

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention program in nursing homes.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Article
  6. [Sensor-based fall detection and prediction].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S HeinrichInstitut für Medizinische Soziologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitsökonomie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. sven_heinrich@ymail.com
I Weigelt
K Rapp
C Becker
U Rissmann
H-H König
Robert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA National Expert Standard for Fall and Fracture Prevention ("Expertenstandard Sturzprophylaxe") was established a few years ago in Germany. The purpose of this study was to determine for the first time the implementation and costs of fall and fracture prevention measures based on this National Expert Standard in German nursing homes in a real world setting. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis before/after study is based on an un-blinded, controlled translational study focussing on the primary prevention of fall-related hip fractures in nursing homes in Bavaria. 274 nursing homes were included in this study in 2008. The intervention aimed at implementing fall and fracture prevention measures based on the National Expert Standard. A random sample of 79 nursing homes was assessed via telephone at baseline and two follow ups. Costs were determined from a societal perspective, based on a questionnaire covering use and costs of fall and fracture prevention measures. Costs were analysed using paired t-tests and non-parametric bootstrapping techniques.

resultsThe implementation of this program led to an increase in fall and fracture prevention activities and to additional mean costs of 6,248 EUR (± SD 7,340 EUR; pricing year 2008) per nursing home over 18 months. Costs varied widely between nursing homes. The majority of additional costs occurred for the implementation of strength and balance training. Depending on type and costs of staff conducting the training, total costs varied between 4,347 EUR (± SD 7,167 EUR) and 7,024 EUR (± SD 7,439 EUR).

conclusionThe implementation of fall and fracture prevention measures based on the National Expert Standard led to additional costs. Cost figures can be used by decision-makers with respect to decisions on resource allocation for different prevention programs (e.g., different National Expert Standards), to determine the main cost components, and finally for model-based cost-effectiveness analyses of fall-prevention programs in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFractures, BoneGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansMaleNursing HomesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID22270892
OpenAlexW2278796812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.